Background: In order to evaluate and improve aesthetic outcome for patients undergoing dermatological surgery, a reliable evaluation tool must be used. The 4-point scale and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) were both developed for this purpose.

Objective: To compare the reliability of the POSAS scale with the 4-point scale for facial linear surgical scars and to assess the influence of different scar characteristics on the overall impression.

Methods: Patients visiting the outpatient clinics of the Maastricht University Medical Centre with linear facial scars were included. The 4-point scale and the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) were completed by three independent observers. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) was completed by the patient on the day of the visit and 2 weeks later. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the reliability of the scales. Linear multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate how the score on each aspect affected the overall opinion.

Results: Fifty scars in 50 patients were included. The ICC of the 4-point scale was 0.819 (95% CI: 0.708-0.892) for multiple observers and 0.602 (95% CI: 0.447-0.734) for single observer. These were superior to the ICCs of total OSAS scores (0.783 95% CI: 0.547-0.888 for multiple observers and 0.546 95% CI: 0.287-0.726 for single observer). ICCs of individual sub-items on the OSAS scored even lower. The sub-items contributed differently to the overall opinion among the different observers or patient.

Conclusion: In terms of reliability, the overall opinion and the 4-point scale were superior to the total POSAS score or the sub-items. Observers do not weight individual scar characteristics equally to arrive at an overall opinion, which challenges the assumption that calculating a total POSAS score by summing of the scores on the individual items is a valid approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13805DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

4-point scale
24
scar assessment
16
assessment scale
16
observer scar
12
scale
11
patient observer
8
scale 4-point
8
linear facial
8
surgical scars
8
scar characteristics
8

Similar Publications

Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is under-utilised in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in obese patients due to concerns about non-evaluable testing. We hypothesise that these concerns are predominantly related to smaller and branch coronary vessels, and CTCA remains adequate for proximal segment stenosis interpretation, which has significant clinical implications. This retrospective cohort study, on consecutive patients referred for CTCA for suspected CAD, grouped patients by body mass index.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: Punctate White Matter Lesion (PWML) is common in neonates. Multi-parametric MR imaging with flexible design (MULTIPLEX, MTP) generates multiple requires only about 6 min for full-head coverage. This study aimed to evaluate the value of T1WI and aT1WI contrasts of MTP in detecting neonatal punctate white matter lesions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aims: Visualization of palisade vessels (PVs) in Barrett's esophagus is crucial for proper assessment. This study aimed to determine whether red dichromatic imaging (RDI) improves PV visibility compared with white-light imaging (WLI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI).

Methods: Five expert and trainee endoscopists evaluated the PV visibility in Barrett's esophagus using WLI, NBI, and RDI on 66 images from 22 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Interactive artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT have gained popularity, yet little is known about their reliability as a reference tool for healthcare-related information for healthcare providers and trainees. The objective of this study was to assess the consistency, quality, and accuracy of the responses generated by ChatGPT on healthcare-related inquiries.

Methods: A total of 18 open-ended questions including six questions in three defined clinical areas (2 each to address "what", "why", and "how", respectively) were submitted to ChatGPT v3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hepatitis B is an infectious disease that inflicts high health and economic costs on the healthcare system. Poor adherence to treatment increases that cost. We aimed to assess the levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) among patients in the West Bank, Palestine, and identify factors associated with good adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!