A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia. | LitMetric

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection under general anesthesia.

World J Gastrointest Endosc

Kanefumi Yamashita, Hironari Shiwaku, Toshihiro Ohmiya, Hideki Shimaoka, Hiroki Okada, Ryo Nakashima, Richiko Beppu, Daisuke Kato, Takamitsu Sasaki, Seiichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Yamashita, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan.

Published: July 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed under general anesthesia.
  • A total of 206 patients underwent ESD for various neoplasms, showing very high rates of en bloc resection and low complication rates, with no significant issues like aspiration pneumonia.
  • The findings suggest that ESD under general anesthesia is a safe and effective approach, with minimized risks when an anesthesiologist is involved.

Article Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) under general anesthesia.

Methods: From January 2011 to July 2014, 206 consecutive patients had undergone ESD under general anesthesia for neoplasms of the stomach, esophagus, and colorectum were enrolled in this retrospective study. The efficacy and safety of ESD under general anesthesia were assessed.

Results: The en bloc resection rate of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal lesions was 100.0%, 98.3%, and 96.1%, respectively. The complication rate of perforation and bleeding were 0.0% and 0.0% in esophageal ESD, 1.7% and 1.7% in gastric ESD, and 3.9% and 2.0% in colorectal ESD, respectively. No cases of aspiration pneumonia were observed. All complications were managed by conservative treatment, with no surgical intervention required.

Conclusion: With the cooperation of an anesthesiologist, ESD under general anesthesia appears to be a useful method, decreasing the risk of complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4937162PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i13.466DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general anesthesia
16
esd general
16
efficacy safety
12
safety endoscopic
8
endoscopic submucosal
8
submucosal dissection
8
esd
7
general
5
dissection general
4
anesthesia
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!