Background: Estimating left ventricular electrical delay (Q-LV) from a 12-lead ECG may be important in evaluating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Q-LV interval on ECG configuration.
Methods: One hundred ninety-two consecutive patients undergoing CRT implantation were divided electrocardiographically into 3 groups: left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), and nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD). The IVCD group was further subdivided into 81 patients with left (L)-IVCD and 15 patients with right (R)-IVCD (resembling RBBB, but without S wave in leads I and aVL). The Q-LV interval in the different groups and the relationship between ECG parameters and the maximum Q-LV interval were analyzed.
Results: Patients with LBBB presented a long Q-LV interval (147.7 ± 14.6 ms, all exceeding cutoff value of 110 ms), whereas RBBB patients presented a very short Q-LV interval (75.2 ± 16.3 ms, all <110 ms). Patients with an IVCD displayed a wide range of Q-LV intervals. In L-IVCD, mid-QRS notching/slurring showed the strongest correlation with a longer Q-LV interval, followed, in decreasing order, by QRS duration >150 ms and intrinsicoid deflection >60 ms. Isolated mid-QRS notching/slurring predicted Q-LV interval >110 ms in 68% of patients. The R-IVCD group presented an unexpectedly longer Q-LV interval (127.0 ± 12.5 ms; 13/15 patients had Q-LV >110 ms).
Conclusion: Patients with LBBB have a very prolonged Q-LV interval. Mid-QRS notching in lateral leads strongly predicts a longer Q-LV interval in L-IVCD patients. Patients with R-IVCD constitute a subgroup of patients with a long Q-LV interval.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.010 | DOI Listing |
HeartRhythm Case Rep
December 2021
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shimizu, Japan.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol
June 2021
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the prognostic value of the time interval from left ventricular (LV) pacing to the earliest onset of QRS complex (S-QRS) for long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Background: The electrical latency during LV pacing evaluated by S-QRS is associated with local tissue property, and the S-QRS ≥37 ms has been previously proposed as an independent predictor of mechanical response to CRT.
Methods: This study included 82 consecutive patients with heart failure with reduced LV ejection fraction (≤35%) and a wide QRS complex (≥120 ms) who underwent CRT.
Heart Rhythm
October 2021
Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; 2(nd) Department of Internal Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Background: QRS complex shortening by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been associated with improved outcomes.
Objective: We hypothesized that the absence of QRS duration (QRSd) prolongation by right ventricular mid-septal pacing (RVP) may indicate complete left bundle branch block (cLBBB).
Methods: We prospectively collected 12-lead surface electrocardiograms (ECGs) and intracardiac electrograms during CRT implant procedures.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
August 2020
Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be associated with LV conduction delay as judged by the invasive assessment of the Q-LV interval. We evaluated whether a novel ECG interval (QR-max index) correlated with the degree of LV conduction delay regardless of the type of non-LBBB ECG pattern, and could, therefore, predict CRT response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeart Rhythm
March 2019
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Background: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the late activation site (LAS) has been proposed as an optimal LV pacing site (ie, Q-LV interval). However, LAS may be relevant to local electrical conduction, measured as an interval from LV pacing stimulation to QRS onset (S-QRS interval).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of S-QRS for reverse remodeling and the impact of S-QRS on pacing QRS configuration in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!