The effect of anesthetic management during intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke in MR CLEAN.

Neurology

From the Departments of Radiology (O.A.B., R.v.d.B., C.B.L.M.M.), Neurology (L.A.v.d.B., P.J.N., Y.B.W.E.M.R.), and Anesthesiology (M.W.H.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Departments of Radiology (P.S.S.F., A.v.d.L.), Neurology (O.A.B., P.S.S.F., D.W.J.D.), and Public Health (H.F.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam; Departments of Radiology (W.H.v.Z.) and Neurology (D.B., R.J.v.O.), Maastricht University Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), the Netherlands; Division of Neurointervention (A.J.Y.), Texas Stroke Institute, Plano; Department of Neurology (W.J.S.), Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein; Department of Neurology (M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Departments of Neurology (J.B.) and Radiology (G.J.L.à.N.), MC Haaglanden, the Hague, the Netherlands.

Published: August 2016

Background: The aim of the current study was to assess the influence of anesthetic management on the effect of treatment in the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN).

Methods: MR CLEAN was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of intra-arterial therapy (IAT) vs no IAT. The intended anesthetic management at the start of the procedure was used for this post hoc analysis. The primary effect parameter was the adjusted common odds ratio (acOR) for a shift in direction of a better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, estimated with multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis, which included a term for general anesthesia (GA).

Results: GA was associated with significant (p = 0.011) effect modification, resulting in estimated decrease of 51% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31%-86%) in treatment effect compared to non-GA. We found a shift in the distribution on the mRS in favor of non-GA compared to control group (acOR 2.18 [95% CI 1.49-3.20]). The shift in distribution between GA and control group was in a similar direction (acOR 1.12 [95% CI 0.71-1.78]) with loss of statistical significance.

Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, we found that the type of anesthetic management influences outcome following IAT. Only treatment without general anesthesia was associated with a significant treatment benefit in MR CLEAN.

Classification Of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing IAT, mRS scores at 90 days improve only in patients treated without GA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002976DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anesthetic management
16
intra-arterial therapy
8
multicenter randomized
8
acute ischemic
8
ischemic stroke
8
post hoc
8
hoc analysis
8
general anesthesia
8
shift distribution
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!