AI Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to find out if heparin flush or saline flush is more effective at preventing blockages in adult central venous catheters (CVC).
- A systematic review included eight randomized controlled trials and one cohort study, showing no significant overall difference between the two flushing methods for most types of CVCs.
- The conclusion suggests that saline is adequate for keeping CVCs open without the risks linked to using heparin.
Article Abstract
Objective: Determining which is the most effective solution (heparin flush compared to 0.9% saline flush) for reducing the risk of occlusions in central venous catheters (CVC) in adults.
Method: The systematic review followed the principles proposed by the Cochrane Handbook; critical analysis, extraction and synthesis of data were performed by two independent researchers; statistical analysis was performed using the RevMan program 5.2.8.
Results: Eight randomized controlled trials and one cohort study were included and the results of the meta-analysis showed no difference (RR=0.68, 95% CI=0.41-1.10; p=0.12). Analysis by subgroups showed that there was no difference in fully deployed CVC (RR=1.09, CI 95%=0.53-2.22; p=0.82); Multi-Lumen CVC showed beneficial effects in the heparin group (RR=0.53, CI 95%=0.29-0.95; p=0.03); in Double-Lumen CVC for hemodialysis (RR=1.18, CI 95%=0.08-17.82; p=0.90) and Peripherally inserted CVC (RR=0.14, CI 95%=0.01-2.60; p=0.19) also showed no difference.
Conclusion: Saline solution is sufficient for maintaining patency of the central venous catheter, preventing the risks associated with heparin administration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000600017 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!