Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the superiority of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) versus cold-knife conization (CKC) in the surgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).

Methods: Systematic searches were performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases to identify all potential articles involving patients with CIN treated with LEEP/LLETZ or CKC published up to February 2016. Risk ratios (RRs) or weighted mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated.

Results: Seven randomized controlled trials, one prospective cohort study, and twelve retrospective cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were no significant differences following LEEP/LLETZ compared with CKC in recurrence rate (RR =1.75, 95% CI =0.99-3.11, P=0.06), positive margin rate (RR =1.45; 95% CI =0.85-2.49, P=0.17), residual disease rate (RR =1.15, 95% CI =0.73-1.81, P=0.48), secondary hemorrhage (RR =1.16, 95% CI =0.74-1.81; P=0.46), or cervical stenosis. Moreover, subgroup analyses based on randomized trials also revealed that no statistical significance was observed in the above outcomes. However, women treated with CKC had a significantly deeper cervical cone than those treated with LLETZ/LEEP (MD =-5.71, 95% CI =-7.45 to -3.96; P<0.001).

Conclusion: LEEP/LLETZ is as effective as CKC with regard to recurrence rate, positive margin rate, residual disease rate, secondary hemorrhage, and cervical stenosis for the surgical treatment of CIN. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934869PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S108832DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cold-knife conization
8
loop electrosurgical
8
electrosurgical excision
8
excision procedure
8
cervical intraepithelial
8
intraepithelial neoplasia
8
95%
7
meta-analysis cold-knife
4
conization versus
4
versus loop
4

Similar Publications

Adenoid basal cell carcinoma: An underrecognized cervical malignancy.

Gynecol Oncol Rep

February 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, United States.

Introduction: Adenoid basal cell carcinoma is a rare cervical malignancy which is indolent in nature but resembles more commonly occurring aggressive malignancies.

Cases: Here we describe three cases of cervical adenoid basal cell carcinoma. All patients had a history of cervical dysplasia with high-risk HPV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable malignancy of the uterine cervix. The tendencies in cervical cancer morbidity and mortality have remained similar for the past decade, albeit with increasing frequency in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Moreover, in the majority of LMICs, cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death among reproductive-age women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * It compares outcomes of large loop excision (LLETZ), cold-knife conization (CKC), and hysterectomy in a cohort of 4,243 patients, finding that LLETZ had a higher recurrence rate of high-grade dysplasia compared to CKC.
  • * When a complete radical excision is achieved, both LLETZ and CKC show similar low rates of recurrence, while hysterectomy results in no cases of cervical dysplasia or cancer, suggesting conservative treatments can be
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Risk factors related to recurrence after surgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia.

Hippokratia

January 2023

Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Article Synopsis
  • This study focused on identifying risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatments for cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN).
  • Researchers analyzed the outcomes of 83 women over seven years, using statistical methods to determine which factors contributed to recurrence following their initial procedures.
  • Key findings revealed that positive endocervical margins, performing multiple excisions, and a surgical cone depth of less than one cm significantly increased the risk of recurrence, with a median recurrence time of 11.6 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pathological Changes and Pregnancy Outcomes in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients After Cold Knife Conization.

Int J Gen Med

August 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, Baoding City, Hebei Province, 071000, People's Republic of China.

Objective: Analyze women treated with underwent cold knife conization (CKC) to remove advanced squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN) of the cervix. The histopathological upgrading of the lesions previously detected on vaginal biopsy and postoperative pregnancy outcomes of were investigated, to identify high-risk subgroups in women.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the First Central Hospital of Baoding City from June 2019 to December 2022 to analyze confirmed cases of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia CIN-II and CIN-III.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!