Blueprint for an Undergraduate Primary Care Curriculum.

Acad Med

S.B. Fazio is associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. M. Demasi is instructor of population health (family medicine), Cambridge Health Alliance, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. E. Farren is education program director, Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. S. Frankl is assistant professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. B. Gottlieb is associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. J. Hoy is resident physician, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. A. Johnson is resident physician, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. J. Kasper is instructor, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. P. Lee is assistant professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. C. McCarthy is assistant professor, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. K. Miller is assistant professor of population medicine (family medicine), Cambridge Health Alliance, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. J. Morris is resident physician, Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California. K. O'Hare is assistant professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. R. Rosales is a medical student, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. L. Simmons is assistant professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. B. Smith is resident physician, Fort Collins Family Medicine Residency, Fort Collins, Colorado. K. Treadway is associate professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. K. Goodell is director for innovation in medical education (family medicine), Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. B. Ogur is associate professor of medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Published: December 2016

In light of the increasing demand for primary care services and the changing scope of health care, it is important to consider how the principles of primary care are taught in medical school. While the majority of schools have increased students' exposure to primary care, they have not developed a standardized primary care curriculum for undergraduate medical education. In 2013, the authors convened a group of educators from primary care internal medicine, pediatrics, family medicine, and medicine-pediatrics, as well as five medical students to create a blueprint for a primary care curriculum that could be integrated into a longitudinal primary care experience spanning undergraduate medical education and delivered to all students regardless of their eventual career choice.The authors organized this blueprint into three domains: care management, specific areas of content expertise, and understanding the role of primary care in the health care system. Within each domain, they described specific curriculum content, including longitudinality, generalism, central responsibility for managing care, therapeutic alliance/communication, approach to acute and chronic care, wellness and prevention, mental and behavioral health, systems improvement, interprofessional training, and population health, as well as competencies that all medical students should attain by graduation.The proposed curriculum incorporates important core features of doctoring, which are often affirmed by all disciplines but owned by none. The authors argue that primary care educators are natural stewards of this curriculum content and can ensure that it complements and strengthens all aspects of undergraduate medical education.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001302DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
40
care
15
care curriculum
12
undergraduate medical
12
medical education
12
primary
10
health care
8
medical students
8
curriculum content
8
curriculum
6

Similar Publications

Background: Mental health remains among the top 10 leading causes of disease burden globally, and there is a significant treatment gap due to limited resources, stigma, limited accessibility, and low perceived need for treatment. Problem Management Plus, a World Health Organization-endorsed brief psychological intervention for mental health disorders, has been shown to be effective and cost-effective in various countries globally but faces implementation challenges, such as quality control in training, supervision, and delivery. While digital technologies to foster mental health care have the potential to close treatment gaps and address the issues of quality control, their development requires context-specific, interdisciplinary, and participatory approaches to enhance impact and acceptance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study examined the effect of lymphedema self-care patient school education on patient functionality, quality of life, body value, and lymphedema volume in patients with lower extremity lymphedema. The study utilized a single-group quasi-experimental design. The study sample included 21 patients with primary and secondary lower extremity lymphedema.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to investigate loss to follow-up (LFU) rates within breast and cervical cancer screening programs in Kenitra-Morocco, identifying contributing factors from both patient and healthcare worker perspectives to enhance care continuity.

Methods: The study was a non-experimental, mixed-methods design conducted in three-phases. We started by identifying LFU women and their characteristics from medical records, interviewing LFU women to ascertain reasons for discontinuation, and surveying healthcare workers for perceived determinants of LFU through semi-structured questionnaires.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Strategies for Fidelity Monitoring a Solution-Focused Brief Intervention in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

J Clin Psychol Med Settings

January 2025

Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Integrated Care (IC) models have increased, but the current mechanisms to analyze the efficacy and fidelity of behavioral interventions within IC models are limited. A mixed methods concurrent process evaluation was used within the context of a randomized clinical trial to assess intervention fidelity for a Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) intervention implemented within an IC model. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to develop a participant survey and charting template for the SFBT intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is preventable. CC screening decreases CC mortality. Emergency department (ED) patients are at disproportionately high risk for nonadherence with CC screening recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!