A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Application of brush cytology for FISH-based detection of 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumors. | LitMetric

Application of brush cytology for FISH-based detection of 1p/19q codeletion in oligodendroglial tumors.

J Neurooncol

Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Published: September 2016

Currently, oligodendroglial tumours (OT) are routinely tested for 1p/19q codeletion, a genetic abnormality of prognostic value. This analysis is most commonly performed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue sections, which is time-consuming and often difficult to interpret, mainly due to the presence of truncated and overlapping nuclei. To overcome these methodological disadvantages, we investigated the validity of cytospins prepared from brushings of fresh tissue samples for assessing 1p/19q status by FISH. For this purpose, FISH analysis of 1p/19q codeletion was performed on FFPE tissue sections and cytospins prepared from brushing of corresponding fresh tissue in a series of 35 central nervous system tumours (16 OT and 19 non-OT). An aberrant 1p/19q status was found in 11/16 (69 %) OT samples and included codeletion of 1p/19q (7), 1p/19q imbalance (2) isolated 19q deletion (1) and 1p imbalance (1). None of the 19 non-OT samples showed 1p/19q codeletion. Results of FISH were concordant between FFPE sections and cytospins in all cases in which both types of slides gave interpretable results. Interpretation of FISH signals on cytospins was easier and quicker than on FFPE sections. Our study showed that cytospins prepared from brushing of fresh tissue samples allow quick and reliable FISH based analysis of 1p/19q status and can substitute traditional FFPE sections when fresh tissue is available.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2211-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

1p/19q codeletion
16
fresh tissue
16
cytospins prepared
12
1p/19q status
12
ffpe sections
12
1p/19q
9
ffpe tissue
8
tissue sections
8
tissue samples
8
analysis 1p/19q
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!