AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to understand the professional and personal experiences of female and male academic surgeons, particularly regarding their perceptions of career advancement and job satisfaction.
  • A survey was conducted in Germany, gathering responses from 63 women and 70 men, revealing that while both genders value expertise and ambition, female surgeons face greater challenges related to gender and childcare.
  • The findings suggest that female surgeons have unique barriers affecting their career progression, emphasizing the need for tailored faculty development programs to foster equality in opportunities and address individual needs.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Given the high attrition rate in the field of academic surgery, we aimed to characterise the professional and personal situations of female and male academic surgeons as well as to gather data on their respective perceptions of career advancement and work satisfaction.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in Germany, inviting all identifiable academically highly qualified female surgeons and their male counterparts in a 1:2 ratio to participate. An anonymous 103-item online questionnaire was designed and the data collected between July and September 2014.

Results: The questionnaire was sent to 93 female and 200 male surgeons, of whom 63 women (67.7%) and 70 men (35.0%) replied. The average age was 47.5 and 47.1 years, respectively. Respondents identified 'high degree of expertise', 'ambition', and 'clarity of one's professional aims' as important factors affecting professional career development. Both groups felt 'workload', 'working hours/shifts', and 'gender' to be a hindrance, the latter of significantly greater importance to female surgeons. The mean work satisfaction scores were high in both female (69.5%) and male (75.7%) surgeons. The predictors 'support from superiors' (standardised β coefficient = 0.41) and 'manual aptitude' (β = 0.41) contributed incrementally to the variance in 'high degree of work satisfaction' (90-100%) observed for female surgeons. However, childcare provided by 'kindergarten/crèche/after-school care' had the greatest negative predictive value (β = -1.33).

Conclusions: Although there are many parallels, female faculty members experience the culture of academic surgery to some extent differently from their male counterparts, especially when impacted by parenthood and childcare. Faculty development programmes need to develop strategies to improve perceived equality in career opportunities by respecting individuals' requirements as well as offering gender-appropriate career guidance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000446874DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

academic surgery
12
female surgeons
12
female
8
female male
8
male counterparts
8
'high degree
8
male
6
surgeons
6
biographic characteristics
4
characteristics factors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!