A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Risk Factors for Removal or Revision of Penile Prostheses in the Veteran Population. | LitMetric

Risk Factors for Removal or Revision of Penile Prostheses in the Veteran Population.

Urology

Department of Urology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; Cooper Drive Division, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Lexington, KY.

Published: December 2016

Objective: To identify comorbid conditions that may increase the likelihood of revision surgery after primary penile prosthesis implantation. To evaluate trends in utilization of prostheses and selection of device within the Veterans Affairs (VA) system.

Methods: A retrospective review of the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database was performed using Current Procedural Technology codes to identify any Veteran who underwent penile prosthesis surgery between January 2000 and December 2013. Age, race, procedure type, and relevant comorbidities were identified and compared between groups.

Results: A total of 6586 patients underwent primary penile prosthesis placement with at least 1 year of follow-up. Peripheral vascular disease (P <.001), smoking (P <.001), hypertension (P = .012), and history of prostate cancer (P = .043) were each associated with a significant increased risk of revision or removal surgery. There was an increase in overall number of implants placed during the study and increased durability with malleable penile prosthesis (MPP), but there was a downward trend in the number of MPP placed relative to inflatable penile prosthesis (P <.001). MPP were more likely to be placed with increasing age (P <.05) and there was a trend toward increased MPP placement in African Americans compared with Caucasians (P = .06).

Conclusion: Peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, smoking, and history of prostate cancer are associated with increased risk for secondary surgery. This raises a provocative question of how vascular insufficiency may play a role in the likelihood of secondary surgery after penile prosthesis placement. Utilization of penile prosthesis placement in the VA system is steadily increasing, most notably with increased numbers of inflatable penile prosthesis placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penile prosthesis
12
primary penile
8
risk factors
4
factors removal
4
removal revision
4
penile
4
revision penile
4
penile prostheses
4
prostheses veteran
4
veteran population
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!