This study determined if high-frequency biphasic stimulation can induce nerve conduction block that persists after the stimulation is terminated, i.e., post-stimulation block. The frog sciatic nerve-muscle preparation was used in the study. Muscle contraction force induced by low-frequency (0.5 Hz) nerve stimulation was recorded to indicate the occurrence and recovery of nerve block induced by the high-frequency (5 or 10 kHz) biphasic stimulation. Nerve block was observed during high-frequency stimulation and after termination of the stimulation. The recovery from post-stimulation block occurred in two distinct phases. During the first phase, the complete block induced during high-frequency stimulation was maintained. The average maximal duration for the first phase was 107 ± 50 s. During the second phase, the block gradually or abruptly reversed. The duration of both first and second phases was dependent on stimulation intensity and duration but not frequency. Stimulation of higher intensity (1.4-2 times block threshold) and longer duration (5 min) produced the longest period (249 ± 58 s) for a complete recovery. Post-stimulation block can be induced by high-frequency biphasic stimulation, which is important for future investigations of the blocking mechanisms and for optimizing the stimulation parameters or protocols in clinical applications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5203977PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11517-016-1539-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-stimulation block
16
biphasic stimulation
16
stimulation
12
block induced
12
induced high-frequency
12
block
9
block frog
8
frog sciatic
8
high-frequency biphasic
8
nerve block
8

Similar Publications

Understanding novel neuromodulation pathways in tDCS: brain stem recordings in rats during trigeminal nerve direct current stimulation.

Transl Psychiatry

October 2024

Research Group Experimental Oto-rhino-laryngology, Department of Neuroscience, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.

Article Synopsis
  • - Recent studies indicate that tDCS may influence brain activity through cranial nerve pathways, particularly the trigeminal nerve, rather than just directly affecting cortical neurons.
  • - Researchers developed an animal model using Sprague Dawley rats to examine how direct current stimulation (TN-DCS) affects neuronal activity in specific trigeminal nerve nuclei (NVsnpr and MeV).
  • - The results showed that TN-DCS increased neuronal spiking during stimulation but returned to baseline afterward, suggesting that cranial nerve pathways may contribute to the effects of tDCS in humans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigated the safety and feasibility of a new spinal electrical stimulation technology called RISES, which allows real-time adjustments to stimulation settings while collecting various data.
  • - Four participants with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) were tested, and results showed no serious adverse effects, with stable skin integrity, vital signs, and pain levels; however, fatigue increased post-stimulation.
  • - The trial compared open-loop and closed-loop stimulation methods, finding that while open-loop sessions had longer stimulation durations, there were no significant differences in setup time or other health measures between the two methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of epiretinal electrical stimulation on the glial cells in a rabbit retinal eyecup model.

Front Neurosci

January 2024

Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Labs, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, White Oak Federal Research Labs, Silver Spring, MD, United States.

Introduction: We examined how pulse train electrical stimulation of the inner surface of the rabbit retina effected the resident glial cells. We used a rabbit retinal eyecup preparation model, transparent stimulus electrodes, and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The endfeet of Müller glia processes line the inner limiting membrane (ILM).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is acknowledged for its non-invasive modulation of neuronal activity in psychiatric disorders. However, its application in insomnia research yields varied outcomes depending on different tDCS types and patient conditions. Our primary objective is to elucidate its efficiency and uncover the underlying mechanisms in insomnia treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recent evidence suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) indirectly influences brain activity through cranial nerve pathways, particularly the trigeminal nerve. However, the electrophysiological effects of direct current (DC) stimulation on the trigeminal nerve (DC-TNS) and its impact on trigeminal nuclei remain unknown. These nuclei exert control over brainstem centers regulating neurotransmitter release, such as serotonin and norepinephrine, potentially affecting global brain activity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!