AI Article Synopsis

  • Soil contamination is a significant issue in Europe, with the need for remediation complicated by high costs, but redeveloping these sites can offer social, economic, and environmental benefits.
  • Human health risk assessments (HRA) are crucial for guiding the remediation and future use of contaminated sites, with the Nitrastur site in Asturias, Spain, serving as a case study.
  • The study found that soil contamination at Nitrastur poses various health risks, primarily from arsenic and lead, with the highest cancer risks projected for residential use, thus informing targeted remediation efforts.

Article Abstract

In Europe soil contamination has been recognized as a serious problem. The needs to remediate contaminated sites are not questionable, although the remediation actions are often hindered by their very high financial costs. On the other hand, the abandoned contaminated sites may have the potential for redevelopment and creating conditions appropriate for their productive reuse bringing social, economic and environmental benefits. The main concern associated with the contaminated sites is their potential adverse health impact. Therefore, in the process of contaminated site redevelopment the risk assessment and the subsequent risk management decisions will play a crucial role. The main objective of this study was to illustrate the role of the human health risk assessment (HRA) in supporting site remediation and reuse decisions. To exemplify the significance of the HRA process in this field the Nitrastur site, located in Asturias, Spain was used. Risks resulting from soil contamination with arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn) and lead (Pb) were assessed under three potential future land use patterns: industrial, residential and recreational. The results of the study indicated that soil at the Nitrastur site might pose non-cancer and cancer risks to potential future receptors - industrial workers, residents and recreational users. Arsenic and lead are the main substances responsible for the health risk and the primary drivers of remedial decisions at the site. The highest total cancer risks were observed under the residential scenario, followed in descending order by the recreational and industrial ones. The remedial maps illustrate in which areas remediation activities are required, depending on a given land use pattern. The obtained results may be used to develop, analyse, compare and select the remedial options within the intended land use pattern. They may also be used to support the decisions concerning the reuse of the site or to create different redevelopment plans for different parts of the site. The study may help improve understanding and interaction between risk assessors and risk managers which are necessary to make proper, fully informed decisions enhancing public trust and credibility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contaminated sites
16
health risk
12
risk assessment
12
human health
8
abandoned contaminated
8
soil contamination
8
sites potential
8
nitrastur site
8
potential future
8
cancer risks
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!