Study Design: Retrospective study.
Purpose: To compare the neurological outcome of transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion with transpedicular decompression for treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.
Overview Of Literature: Few articles have addressed the impact of neurological recovery in patients with tuberculosis who were treated by two different operative methods via the posterior-only approach.
Methods: Clinical and radiographic results of one-stage posterior instrumented spinal fusion for treatment of tuberculous spondylodiscitis with neurological deficits were reviewed and analyzed from 2009 to 2013. The extensive (E) group consisted of patients who received transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion, whereas transpedicular decompression was performed on limited (L) group. Rapid recovery was improvement of at least one Frankel grade within 6 weeks after operation. Otherwise, it was slow recovery.
Results: All 39 patients had improved neurological signs. The median follow-up period was 24 months. Proportionately younger patients (under 65 years of age) received extensive surgery (15 of 18, 83.3% vs. 11 of 21, 52.4%; p=0.04). The mean operative time and blood loss in the group E were higher than in the group L (both p<0.01). With regard to type of procedure, especially at thoracic and thoracolumbar spine, patients who underwent extensive surgery had rapid neurological recovery significantly different from those of limited surgery (p=0.01; Relative Risk, 3.06; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.13 to 8.29).
Conclusions: Transforaminal debridement and interbody fusion provides more rapid neurological recovery in patients with thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis compared to transpedicular decompression.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4917775 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.3.543 | DOI Listing |
Int J Spine Surg
November 2024
Advanced Orthopedics, Altamonte Springs, Orlando, FL, USA.
Background: The authors conducted a comprehensive review and integration of insights from 4 webinars hosted by the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) to arrive at recommendations for best clinical practices for guideline development for endoscopic spine surgery. This perspective article discusses the limitations of traditional surgical trials and amalgamates surgeons' experience and research on various cutting-edge techniques.
Methods: Data were extracted from surveys conducted during each webinar session involving 3639 surgeons globally.
Neurospine
September 2024
Department of Spine Surgery and Orthopaedics, Xiangya Spinal Surgery Center, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Asian J Surg
October 2024
Gansu Provincial Hospital, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, PR China. Electronic address:
Orthop Surg
June 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
December 2023
Department of Spinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Work, 315000, China.
Background: Spinal subdural hematoma (SSH) is a rare cause of compression of the neutral elements of the spinal cord. However, little is known about the presentation of acute SSH after lumbar spine surgery. The reason for this may be that symptomatic SSH occurs rarely and is not given enough attention by spine surgeons.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!