Background: Rectourethral fistulas (RUFs) represent an uncommon complication of pelvic surgery, especially radical prostatectomy. To date there is no standardised treatment for managing RUFs. This represents a challenge for surgeons, mainly because of the potential recurrence risk.
Objective: To describe our minimally invasive transanal repair (MITAR) of RUFs and to assess its safety and outcomes.
Design, Setting, And Participants: We retrospectively evaluated 12 patients who underwent MITAR of RUF at our centre from October 2008 to December 2014. Exclusion criteria were a fistula diameter greater than 1.5cm, sepsis, and/or faecaluria.
Surgical Procedure: After fistula identification through cystoscopy and 5F-catheter positioning within the fistula, MITAR is performed using laparoscopic instruments introduced through Parks' anal retractor. The fibrotic margins of the fistula are carefully dissected by a lozenge incision of the rectal wall, parallel to the rectal axis. Under the healthy flap of the rectal wall the urothelium is located and the fistulous tract is sutured with interrupted stitches. After a leakage test of the bladder, the rectal wall is sutured with interrupted stitches. Electrocoagulation is never used during this procedure.
Measurements: Fistula closure, postoperative complications, and recurrence.
Results And Limitations: Median follow-up was 21 (range, 12-74) mo. Median operative time was 58 (range, 50-70) min. Median hospital stay was 1.5 (range, 1-4) d. Early surgical complications occurred in one patient (8.3%). Recurrence did not occur in any of the cases. Limitations included retrospective analysis, small case load, and lack of experience with radiation-induced fustulas.
Conclusions: MITAR is a safe, effective, and reproducible procedure. Its advantages are low morbidity and quick recovery, and no need for a colostomy.
Patient Summary: We studied the treatment of rectourethral fistulas. Our technique, transanally performed using laparoscopic instruments, was found to be safe, feasible, and effective, with limited risk of complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.006 | DOI Listing |
J Pediatr Surg
January 2025
Tanta University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; Kenanah Children's Medical Center, Tanta, Egypt. Electronic address:
BMJ Case Rep
December 2024
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Despite the widespread use of perirectal spacers to reduce radiation-induced rectal toxicity during prostate cancer treatment, postmarketing data reveal rare but significant complications. This case report details a severe complication of rectourethral fistula necessitating robotic pelvic exenteration with urinary and faecal diversion following perirectal spacer placement. Although SpaceOAR has been shown to reduce rectal radiation dose, the ensuing clinical benefit remains inconclusive in real-world data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Surg Int
December 2024
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation, 1-1-240-6, Kanayama, Teine-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 006-0041, Japan.
Purpose: This study aimed to identify surgical site infection (SSI) risk factors after anal reconstruction surgery in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs).
Methods: This retrospective analysis from January 2013 to December 2022, including all pediatric surgical facilities in Hokkaido, Japan, examined consecutive patients with ARMs, excluding cloacal cases, regarding perioperative and SSI factors during their initial anal reconstruction surgeries.
Results: This study involved 157 cases of major clinical groups and 7 cases of rare/regional variants, among whom 4% developed SSIs.
A 65-year-old male patient with a history of external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer and multiple urological surgeries developed a rectourethral fistula after treatment for urethral diverticulum with stones. In managing this complex case, a Penrose drain was utilized as a spacer during artificial urinary sphincter cuff removal to preserve the urethral space for future sphincter re-implantation. This report highlights the novel application of a Penrose drain as a spacer in urological surgery and its benefits in minimizing tissue contraction and preserving urethral health.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Internal Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!