AI Article Synopsis

  • HPV testing is increasingly accepted as a more effective alternative to cytology for cervical cancer screening, showing higher sensitivity for detecting high-grade lesions, but it may lead to more colposcopy referrals.
  • A study in Chiang Mai, Northern Thailand, evaluated the performance of HPV tests and the impact of genotyping on triaging HPV-positive women, revealing that HPV testing detected 100% of HSIL+ cases compared to 64.9% for Pap tests, but at a higher colposcopy referral rate.
  • Genotyping identified HPV52, HPV16, and HPV58 as the most common types in those with HSIL+, with the triage using HPV16/18/52/58 demonstrating superior sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to just HPV

Article Abstract

Background: Testing for high-risk human papillomavirus DNA (HPV test) has gained increasing acceptance as an alternative method to cytology in cervical cancer screening. Compared to cytology, HPV test has a higher sensitivity for the detection of histologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+), but this could lead to a large colposcopy burden. Genotyping for HPV16/18 has been recommended in triaging HPV-positive women. This study was aimed to evaluate the screening performance of HPV testing and the role of genotyping triage in Northern Thailand.

Methods: A population-based cervical screening program was performed in Chiang Mai (Northern Thailand) using cytology (conventional Pap test) and HPV test (Hybrid Capture 2). Women who had abnormal cytology or were HPV-positive were referred for colposcopy. Cervical samples from these women were genotyped using the Linear Array assay.

Results: Of 5,456 women, 2.0% had abnormal Pap test results and 6.5% tested positive with Hybrid Capture 2. Of 5,433 women eligible for analysis, 355 with any positive test had histologic confirmation and 57 of these had histologic HSIL+. The sensitivity for histologic HSIL+ detection was 64.9% for Pap test and 100% for Hybrid Capture 2, but the ratio of colposcopy per detection of each HSIL+ was more than two-fold higher with Hybrid Capture 2 than Pap test (5.9 versus 2.8). Genotyping results were available in 316 samples. HPV52, HPV16, and HPV58 were the three most common genotypes among women with histologic HSIL+. Performance of genotyping triage using HPV16/18/52/58 was superior to that of HPV16/18, with a higher sensitivity (85.7% versus 28.6%) and negative predictive value (94.2% versus 83.9%).

Conclusions: In Northern Thailand, HPV testing with genotyping triage shows better screening performance than cervical cytology alone. In this region, the addition of genotyping for HPV52/58 to HPV16/18 is deemed necessary in triaging women with positive HPV test.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4918932PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158184PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hpv test
20
pap test
16
hybrid capture
16
northern thailand
12
genotyping triage
12
histologic hsil+
12
test
10
genotyping
8
human papillomavirus
8
hpv
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!