[Comparison of root resorption between self-ligating and conventional brackets using cone-beam CT].

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue

Department of Orthodontics, Hangzhou Dental Hospital. Hangzhou 310005,Zhejiang Provinceļ¼ŒChina.

Published: April 2016

Purpose: To analyze the differences of root resorption between passive self-ligating and conventional brackets, and to determine the relationship between passive self-ligating brackets and root resorption.

Methods: Fifty patients were randomly divided into 2 groups using passive self-ligating brackets or conventional straight wire brackets (0.022 system), respectively. Cone-beam CT was taken before and after treatment. The amount of external apical root resorption of maxillary incisors was measured on CBCT images. Student's t test was performed to analyze the differences of root apical resorption between the 2 groups with SPSS17.0 software package.

Results: No significant difference(P> 0.05) in root resorption of maxillary incisors was found between passive self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets.

Conclusions: Passive self-ligating brackets and conventional brackets can cause root resorption, but the difference was not significant. Passive self-ligating brackets do not induce more root resorption.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

root resorption
24
passive self-ligating
24
self-ligating brackets
20
conventional brackets
12
brackets conventional
12
brackets
9
self-ligating conventional
8
analyze differences
8
differences root
8
brackets root
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!