AI Article Synopsis

  • The study shows that fast Monte Carlo simulations can enhance inverse biological planning for treating head and neck tumors with spot-scanning proton therapy.
  • Recent advancements in GPU technology allow for improved dose calculations and biological dose optimization, which can be completed efficiently in under 30 minutes.
  • The results indicate that biologically optimized plans can significantly boost biological dose for smaller tumors while providing better dose sparing for critical structures, though larger tumors faced limitations in achieving similar results.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Our aim is to demonstrate the feasibility of fast Monte Carlo (MC)-based inverse biological planning for the treatment of head and neck tumors in spot-scanning proton therapy.

Methods And Materials: Recently, a fast and accurate graphics processor unit (GPU)-based MC simulation of proton transport was developed and used as the dose-calculation engine in a GPU-accelerated intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimizer. Besides dose, the MC can simultaneously score the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd), which makes biological dose (BD) optimization possible. To convert from LETd to BD, a simple linear relation was assumed. By use of this novel optimizer, inverse biological planning was applied to 4 patients, including 2 small and 1 large thyroid tumor targets, as well as 1 glioma case. To create these plans, constraints were placed to maintain the physical dose (PD) within 1.25 times the prescription while maximizing target BD. For comparison, conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and IMPT plans were also created using Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) in each case. The same critical-structure PD constraints were used for the IMRT, IMPT, and biologically optimized plans. The BD distributions for the IMPT plans were obtained through MC recalculations.

Results: Compared with standard IMPT, the biologically optimal plans for patients with small tumor targets displayed a BD escalation that was around twice the PD increase. Dose sparing to critical structures was improved compared with both IMRT and IMPT. No significant BD increase could be achieved for the large thyroid tumor case and when the presence of critical structures mitigated the contribution of additional fields. The calculation of the biologically optimized plans can be completed in a clinically viable time (<30 minutes) on a small 24-GPU system.

Conclusions: By exploiting GPU acceleration, MC-based, biologically optimized plans were created for small-tumor target patients. This optimizer will be used in an upcoming feasibility trial on LETd painting for radioresistant tumors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.041DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imrt impt
12
biological dose
8
dose optimization
8
treatment head
8
head neck
8
spot-scanning proton
8
proton therapy
8
inverse biological
8
biological planning
8
intensity modulated
8

Similar Publications

We assessed the effect of beam size on plan robustness for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck cancer (HNC) and compared the plan quality including robustness with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). IMPT plans were generated for six HNC patients using six beam sizes (air-sigma 3-17 mm at isocenter for a 70-230 MeV) and two optimization methods for planning target volume-based non-robust optimization (NRO) and clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization (RO). Worst-case dosimetric parameters and plan robustness for CTV and organs-at-risk (OARs) were assessed under different scenarios, assuming a ± 1-5 mm setup error and a ± 3% range error.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

At the 2024 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), several important studies on radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were presented. There were two Chinese phase III trials on treatment escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition with camrelizumab after induction chemotherapy and cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (RCT) in the DIPPER trial reached the primary endpoint of improved event-free survival (EFS) but did not improve overall survival (OS). Simultaneous and adjuvant administration of the angiogenesis inhibitor endostar in addition to cisplatin-based RCT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma led to a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Proton therapy requires careful consideration when treating areas close to neural structures, and this study aims to compare dosimetric profiles of two techniques: intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa).
  • Researchers generated treatment plans for 28 NPCa patients and conducted dosimetric comparisons, focusing on target coverage and doses to critical organs at risk (OARs), finding that IMPT had better dose spillage while HT was more beneficial for protecting the brainstem and optic structures.
  • The study identifies key criteria for selecting treatment methods, indicating that patients with larger tumors (cT4) or those with less than 0
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Radiation-induced lymphopenia is a common immune toxicity that adversely impacts treatment outcomes. We report here our approach to translate a deep-learning (DL) model developed to predict severe lymphopenia risk among esophageal cancer into a strategy for incorporating the immune system as an organ-at-risk (iOAR) to mitigate the risk.

Materials And Methods: We conducted "virtual clinical trials" utilizing retrospective data for 10 intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 10 passively-scattered proton therapy (PSPT) esophageal cancer patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Proton therapy (PRT) for Head Neck Cancer (HNC), in view of the Bragg peak, spares critical structures like oral mucosa better than IMRT. In PRT, mouth-bites, besides immobilising and separating mucosal surfaces, may also negate the end-of-range effect. We retrospectively analysed the details and dosimetric impact of mouth-bites in PRT for HNC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!