Intravenous Versus Oral Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Anemia in CKD: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Am J Kidney Dis

Department of Medicine A, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel.

Published: November 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • Iron supplementation is essential for treating anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) iron versus oral iron for CKD stages 3 to 5 remains debated.!
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 trials found that IV iron significantly improved hemoglobin levels in patients with CKD, especially in those on dialysis (stage 5D), with risk ratios indicating a higher likelihood of achieving desired hemoglobin increases.!
  • While IV iron was more effective, it also presented a greater risk of causing hypotension compared to oral iron, although overall safety regarding mortality and severe adverse effects was similar between both methods of supplementation.!

Article Abstract

Background: Iron supplementation is crucial for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although intravenous (IV) iron is preferred for patients with CKD receiving dialysis (CKD stage 5D), the method of iron replacement for patients with CKD stages 3 to 5 is controversial.

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was performed until October 2015 of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings in nephrology, and reference lists of included trials.

Setting & Population: Patients with CKD stages 3 to 5 or 5D.

Selection Criteria For Studies: All randomized controlled trials, regardless of publication status or language.

Intervention: IV versus oral iron supplementation.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was defined as percentage of patients reaching an elevation in hemoglobin (Hb) concentration > 1g/dL. Secondary end points included percentage of patients who reached Hb levels > 11g/dL, absolute Hb concentration, change in Hb concentration, transferrin saturation, ferritin levels, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and blood transfusion requirement, and quality of life. Safety analysis included all-cause mortality and serious and all adverse events.

Results: 24 trials were identified, 13 including 2,369 patients with CKD stages 3 to 5 and 11 including 818 patients with CKD stage 5D. Patients treated with IV iron were more likely to reach an Hb response > 1g/dL (risk ratios [RRs] of 1.61 [95% CI, 1.39-1.87] for CKD stages 3-5 and 2.14 [95% CI, 1.68-2.72] for CKD stage 5D). Safety analysis showed similar rates of mortality and serious and any adverse effects. IV iron replacement was associated with higher risk for hypotension (RR, 3.71; 95% CI, 1.74-7.94) and fewer gastrointestinal adverse events (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.67).

Limitations: Significant heterogeneity between trials; follow-up was usually limited to 3 months.

Conclusions: Our results agree with current recommendations for IV iron replacement for patients with CKD stage 5D and support increased use of IV iron for patients with CKD stages 3 to 5.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.04.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients ckd
28
ckd stages
20
ckd stage
16
ckd
12
iron replacement
12
patients
10
iron
9
versus oral
8
oral iron
8
iron supplementation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!