A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Low-flow mediated constriction incorporated indices as indicators of cardiovascular risk in smokers. | LitMetric

Background And Aims: Low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC), the endothelial response to reduced blood flow by forearm compression, is present in some smokers. The differences between smokers with and without L-FMC are unclear. It is also unknown whether flow-mediated total dilation (FMTD) or modified flow-mediated dilation (mFMD), both of which incorporate information concerning L-FMC, could be used to estimate cardiovascular risk. We sought to clarify the clinical factors associated with the presence of L-FMC in smokers according to sex and examine whether L-FMC incorporated indices would be better than a conventional index to estimate cardiovascular risk in smokers.

Methods: In total, 140 consecutive smokers (58 ± 13 years old) with no coronary heart disease and 48 non-smokers, who comprised the age- and sex-matched control group, were enrolled.

Results: L-FMC was demonstrated in 33.6% (47/140) and 25% (12/48) of the smokers and non-smokers, respectively. In male smokers, the predictors of the presence of L-FMC were age (p = 0.014), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.045), and baseline brachial arterial diameter (Dbase) (p = 0.048). In female smokers, there were no predictors of the presence of L-FMC. The correlations between the Framingham risk score (FRS) and %FMTD (r = -0.34) and between FRS and %mFMD (r = -0.33) were stronger than that between FRS and conventional flow-mediated dilation (%cFMD) (r = -0.20).

Conclusions: Independent predictors of the presence of L-FMC were age, BMI, and Dbase in male smokers. L-FMC incorporated indices may be good alternatives to cFMD to estimate cardiovascular risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiovascular risk
16
presence l-fmc
16
incorporated indices
12
estimate cardiovascular
12
predictors presence
12
l-fmc
10
smokers
9
smokers l-fmc
8
flow-mediated dilation
8
l-fmc incorporated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!