Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background And Aims: Low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC), the endothelial response to reduced blood flow by forearm compression, is present in some smokers. The differences between smokers with and without L-FMC are unclear. It is also unknown whether flow-mediated total dilation (FMTD) or modified flow-mediated dilation (mFMD), both of which incorporate information concerning L-FMC, could be used to estimate cardiovascular risk. We sought to clarify the clinical factors associated with the presence of L-FMC in smokers according to sex and examine whether L-FMC incorporated indices would be better than a conventional index to estimate cardiovascular risk in smokers.
Methods: In total, 140 consecutive smokers (58 ± 13 years old) with no coronary heart disease and 48 non-smokers, who comprised the age- and sex-matched control group, were enrolled.
Results: L-FMC was demonstrated in 33.6% (47/140) and 25% (12/48) of the smokers and non-smokers, respectively. In male smokers, the predictors of the presence of L-FMC were age (p = 0.014), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.045), and baseline brachial arterial diameter (Dbase) (p = 0.048). In female smokers, there were no predictors of the presence of L-FMC. The correlations between the Framingham risk score (FRS) and %FMTD (r = -0.34) and between FRS and %mFMD (r = -0.33) were stronger than that between FRS and conventional flow-mediated dilation (%cFMD) (r = -0.20).
Conclusions: Independent predictors of the presence of L-FMC were age, BMI, and Dbase in male smokers. L-FMC incorporated indices may be good alternatives to cFMD to estimate cardiovascular risk.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.06.022 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!