A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

CT Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: Effect of Small Focal Spot Imaging and Iterative Model Reconstruction on the Image Quality. | LitMetric

Rationale And Objectives: We investigated the effects of small focal spot (SFS) imaging and iterative model reconstruction (IMR) on the image quality of computed tomography angiographs (CTA) in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Materials And Methods: We divided 60 consecutive patients with suspected or confirmed peripheral artery disease into two equal groups. One group underwent large focal spot scanning under our standard CTA protocol with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose(4)) (protocol 1), and the other underwent scanning with the SFS protocol and IMR (protocol 2). Quantitative image quality parameters, ie, arterial computed tomography attenuation, image noise, and the contrast-to-noise ratio, were compared and the visual image quality (depiction of each vessel) was scored on a 5-point scale.

Results: There was no significant difference in the arterial attenuation among all evaluated slice levels. The mean image noise was significantly lower under protocol 2 and the contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher at all slice levels. The visual scores assigned to the two protocols for the depiction of large vessels, such as the abdominal aorta and iliac artery, were comparable. However, the mean visual scores for small vessels in the lower extremities were significantly higher under protocol 2.

Conclusion: CTA with SFS and IMR yielded significantly better qualitative and quantitative image quality especially for small vessels.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.05.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
20
focal spot
12
patients peripheral
8
peripheral arterial
8
small focal
8
imaging iterative
8
iterative model
8
model reconstruction
8
computed tomography
8
quantitative image
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!