Background: Several studies showed that age is significantly associated with impaired outcomes after open colorectal surgery. However, very few data exist on laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to assess operative results of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery according to age.
Methods: From 2005 to 2014, 446 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer resection were identified from a prospective database. Five groups were defined: age <45 (n = 44), 45-54 (n = 80), 55-64 (n = 166), 65-74 (n = 95) and ≥75 years (n = 61).
Results: Elderly patients presented significantly higher ASA score (p = 0.004), higher Charlson comorbidity index (p < 0.0001) and more frequent cardiovascular, pulmonary (p < 0.0001) and neurological (p = 0.03) comorbidities. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was similar between groups (34-35-37-43-43 %, p = 0.70). Medical morbidity slightly increased with age (14-9-14-19-26 %, p = 0.06), but there was no significant difference regarding clinical anastomotic leakage, surgical morbidity, major morbidity (Dindo ≥3), cardiopulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, age was not an independent factor for postoperative morbidity, unlike ASA score ≥3 (p = 0.039), neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.034) and operative time ≥240 min (p = 0.013).
Conclusions: This study showed that laparoscopic rectal cancer resection might safely be performed irrespective of age.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5009-4 | DOI Listing |
Int J Med Inform
December 2024
Chongqing Cancer Multiomics Big Data Application Engineering Research Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing 400030, China. Electronic address:
Background: With advancements in healthcare, traditional VTE risk assessment tools are increasingly insufficient to meet the demands of high-quality care, underscoring the need for innovative and specialized assessment methods.
Objective: Owing to the remarkable success of machine learning in supervised learning and disease prediction, our objective is to develop a reliable and efficient model for assessing VTE risk by leveraging the fundamental data and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients within our medical facility.
Methods: Six commonly used machine learning algorithms were utilized in our study to predict the occurrence of VTE in patients with rectal cancer.
Int J Med Robot
February 2025
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Background: Single port robotic platform offers articulation and 360° camera rotation for anorectal tumour excision in a narrow pelvic space. This study assesses the clinical usefulness and outcomes of SP robotic transanal surgery.
Methods: Nine patients who underwent transanal excision using the SP robotic platform were included.
Ann Surg Oncol
December 2024
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Background: The Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), calculated intraoperatively, has previously yielded mixed results when correlated with computed tomography. This study aimed to quantify variation in this scoring method comparing radiologists' and surgeons' radiologic PCI (rPCI) assessment.
Methods: The rPCI of 104 patients treated at a single institution for peritoneal carcinomatosis was calculated by an abdominal radiologist and a surgeon.
Sci Rep
December 2024
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Recently, neoadjuvant short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) has emerged as a valid treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We assessed SCRT plans using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with Halcyon and Infinity medical linear accelerators (Linacs) and compared the plan quality and delivery efficiency across all cases. Thirty patients who underwent preoperative SCRT for LARC at the hospital were randomly selected.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Colorectal Cancer
December 2024
Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address:
Background: Current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for colorectal cancer utilizes TNM framework groups disease based on extent and provides prognostic information, ideally with a hierarchical logic. We sought to evaluate survival as a function of stage within the 8 edition AJCC staging system for colon and rectal cancer.
Methods: Patients with primary colon or rectal cancer diagnosed 2010-2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!