AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines how updating internal models for predicting future events relies heavily on temporal attention, as it needs to adapt to varying environmental demands.
  • Using fMRI, researchers identified specific brain areas engaged during different types of motion: non-periodic motion activated regions associated with temporal orienting, while periodic motion activated parts of the default-mode network.
  • Findings indicate a right-hemisphere dominance for timing mechanisms and suggest that the default-mode network may contribute to processing expected information in different contexts.

Article Abstract

The updating of prospective internal models is necessary to accurately predict future observations. Uncertainty-driven internal model updating has been studied using a variety of perceptual paradigms, and have revealed engagement of frontal and parietal areas. In a distinct literature, studies on temporal expectations have also characterized a time-perception network, which relies on temporal orienting of attention. However, the updating of prospective internal models is highly dependent on temporal attention, since temporal attention must be reoriented according to the current environmental demands. In this study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate to what extend the continuous manipulation of temporal prediction would recruit update-related areas and the time-perception network areas. We developed an exogenous temporal task that combines rhythm cueing and time-to-contact principles to generate implicit temporal expectation. Two patterns of motion were created: periodic (simple harmonic oscillation) and non-periodic (harmonic oscillation with variable acceleration). We found that non-periodic motion engaged the exogenous temporal orienting network, which includes the ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices, and the cerebellum, as well as the presupplementary motor area, which has previously been implicated in internal model updating, and the motion-sensitive area MT+. Interestingly, we found a right-hemisphere preponderance suggesting the engagement of explicit timing mechanisms. We also show that the periodic motion condition, when compared to the non-periodic motion, activated a particular subset of the default-mode network (DMN) midline areas, including the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and bilateral posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus (PCC/PC). It suggests that the DMN plays a role in processing contextually expected information and supports recent evidence that the DMN may reflect the validation of prospective internal models and predictive control. Taken together, our findings suggest that continuous manipulation of temporal predictions engages representations of temporal prediction as well as task-independent updating of internal models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4889611PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00268DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

internal models
16
time-perception network
12
temporal prediction
12
prospective internal
12
temporal
11
periodic motion
8
updating prospective
8
internal model
8
model updating
8
temporal orienting
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!