AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated how different DNA extraction kits affect the community structure of intestinal microbiota in the shrimp species Litopenaeus vannamei using high-throughput sequencing.
  • Three commercial DNA extraction kits were compared in terms of yield and purity of DNA, with the Bacterial Kit yielding the best results, while the Tissue Kit had insufficient DNA for effective amplification.
  • Although the Stool Kit produced a higher variety of microbial taxa, the Bacterial Kit showed more consistent results across replicates, indicating that extraction method can significantly impact the analysis of microbial communities.

Article Abstract

Objectives: High-throughput sequencing technology is increasingly applied in intestinal microbiota of aquatic animals including shrimp. However, there is a lack of standard method or kit for DNA isolation from shrimp intestinal microbiota, and little is known about the effectiveness and biases regarding DNA extraction based on high-throughput sequencing. The aim of this study was to study the biases of different DNA extraction kits on community structure of shrimp intestinal microbiota through high-throughput sequencing, and to better understand the structure and composition of bacterial flora associated with healthy Litopenaeus vannamei.

Methods: We extracted the total DNA of intestinal microbiota from L. vannamei with three commercial kits designed for DNA extraction from bacteria, stool and tissue (Omega, USA). DNA quality was evaluated based on the absorbance ratios of 260/280 nm by NanoDrop, while DNA concentration was quantified using PicoGreen. Then Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing was used to examine the intestinal bacterial communities following PCR amplification of 16S rDNA V4 region.

Results: The yield and purity of the DNA from the Bacterial Kit (SIB) were superior to those from the Stool Kit (SIS), whereas the DNA from Tissue Kit (SIT) presented too small amount to be amplified efficiently. The average sequence reads obtained from SIB and SIS samples were 52151 ± 5085 and 55296 ± 5147 respectively. After resampling at the same depth of 46800 reads, the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) number and Shannon diversity index of SIS samples were significantly higher than those of SIB samples. By contrast, the reproducibility of OTU among SIB replicates was higher than that among SIS replicates. The dominant phyla of SIS and SIB samples were identical, including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Actinobacteria, and Cyanobacteria. However, the relative abundances of almost all the dominant groups at various taxonomic levels differed greatly between these two samples.

Conclusion: Significant biases on community structure of shrimp intestinal microbiota were detected which originated from DNA extraction. And the core microbiota of the healthy L. vannamei in this study was mainly composed of genera Photobacterium, Lactococcus, Aliivibrio, Vibrio, as well as three other unclassified groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intestinal microbiota
24
dna extraction
20
shrimp intestinal
16
high-throughput sequencing
16
community structure
12
dna
11
biases dna
8
structure shrimp
8
sis samples
8
sib samples
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!