Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article aims to address approaches to ensuring method changes for regulated ligand-binding assays of biologics drugs from old to newer formats and technology are properly understood, characterized and validated to meet current industry expectations and regulatory requirements. Sections in the chapter will include descriptions of different formats of ligand-binding assays, reasons that may drive updating of methods and procedures for qualifying method changes for immunoassays that are designed to support PK and immunogenicity analyses for clinical and nonclinical applications. Case studies from the authors' experience, as well as literature references will be provided as examples of challenges, as well as providing guidance of when and how to provide smooth transitions of older methods to newer, more robust or sensitive methods as reagents or technology are available.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/bio.16.33 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!