An Agenda for Improving Perioperative Code Status Discussion.

A A Case Rep

From the *Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; †Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns, and Surgical Critical Care, and the Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts; §Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and ‖Harvard Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Published: June 2016

Code status discussions (CSDs) clarify patient preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. CSDs are a key component of perioperative care, particularly at the end of life, and must be both patient-centered and shared. Physicians at all levels of training are insufficiently trained in and inappropriately perform CSD; this may be particularly true of perioperative physicians. In this article, we describe the difficulty of achieving a patient-centered, shared perioperative CSD in the case of a medical professional with a do-not-resuscitate order. We provide a brief background in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, do-not-resuscitate, and CSD before proposing an agenda for improving perioperative CSD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000327DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agenda improving
8
improving perioperative
8
code status
8
cardiopulmonary resuscitation
8
patient-centered shared
8
perioperative csd
8
perioperative
5
perioperative code
4
status discussion
4
discussion code
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!