AI Article Synopsis

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a major type of membrane receptors that play crucial roles in various physiological processes by changing conformation when activated by agonists.
  • Some GPCRs can remain in inactive states even when agonists are present, indicating complexities in how these receptors function at the molecular level, which are not thoroughly understood.
  • This study specifically investigates muscarinic M2 receptors using advanced techniques to show that agonists can bind in different ways, leading to distinct levels of receptor activity; thus, understanding these interactions may help explain why some agonist-receptor complexes are inactive.

Article Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors constitute the largest family of membrane receptors and modulate almost every physiological process in humans. Binding of agonists to G protein-coupled receptors induces a shift from inactive to active receptor conformations. Biophysical studies of the dynamic equilibrium of receptors suggest that a portion of receptors can remain in inactive states even in the presence of saturating concentrations of agonist and G protein mimetic. However, the molecular details of agonist-bound inactive receptors are poorly understood. Here we use the model of bitopic orthosteric/allosteric (i.e. dualsteric) agonists for muscarinic M2 receptors to demonstrate the existence and function of such inactive agonist·receptor complexes on a molecular level. Using all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, dynophores (i.e. a combination of static three-dimensional pharmacophores and molecular dynamics-based conformational sampling), ligand design, and receptor mutagenesis, we show that inactive agonist·receptor complexes can result from agonist binding to the allosteric vestibule alone, whereas the dualsteric binding mode produces active receptors. Each agonist forms a distinct ligand binding ensemble, and different agonist efficacies depend on the fraction of purely allosteric (i.e. inactive) versus dualsteric (i.e. active) binding modes. We propose that this concept may explain why agonist·receptor complexes can be inactive and that adopting multiple binding modes may be generalized also to small agonists where binding modes will be only subtly different and confined to only one binding site.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4965584PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.735431DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agonist·receptor complexes
12
binding modes
12
ligand binding
8
agonist efficacies
8
receptors
8
protein-coupled receptors
8
binding
8
inactive agonist·receptor
8
inactive
7
agonist
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!