Three botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products, incobotulinumtoxinA, onabotulinumtoxinA, and abobotulinumtoxinA, all manufactured by different methods, are employed in clinical practice. Comparing the three BoNT/A products is difficult because their concentrations and volumes differ and the precise dose equivalence ratio is not known. We aimed to compare the neurotoxic potencies by a systematic analysis of injected volume and dose. The potency of BoNT in inducing hind limb paresis was assessed by analyzing the wheel-running performance of mice. To standardize the volume, the effect of an identical dose of incobotulinumtoxinA dissolved in different volumes of saline (15, 10, 5, and 2μl) was studied in four groups of mice (n=13-15). The potencies of the BoNT products were then compared by injecting identical volumes (10μl) containing different doses into both hind leg muscles. Mice injected with incobotulinumtoxinA showed a volume-dependent reduction in wheel-running, with larger volumes inducing more intense paresis. A standardized volume containing the same number of mouse units of the BoNT/A products produced different degrees of paresis. The conversion ratio of incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA is estimated to be between 1:0.75 and 1:0.5. OnabotulinumtoxinA displayed a two-fold greater potency than abobotulinumtoxinA. Doses of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA that produce an identical severity of pareses even result in the same duration of pareses. This wheel-running assay allows one to compare the neurotoxic potency of different volumes and doses of the BoNT products in vivo. Our results argue against common clinical practice because incobotulinumtoxinA and onabotulinumtoxinA are not readily interchangeable and a two-fold dose of abobotulinumtoxinA is needed to induce an effect identical to onabotulinumtoxinA. In addition, this emphasizes that the duration of BoNT-induced effect is the same as long as equipotent doses of BoNT are injected.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.001 | DOI Listing |
J Cosmet Dermatol
January 2025
Ophthalmologist - Oculoplastic Surgery, Sociedad Internacional de Rejuvenecimiento Facial no Quirurgico (SIRF), Barranquilla, Colombia.
Background: Botulinum toxin (BTX) is globally the most common aesthetic procedure. Its usage has expanded beyond facial treatments to therapeutic areas, including managing scars and postsurgical deformities. Breast cancer survivors often face significant deformities and asymmetry during recovery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFToxins (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy.
Botulinum toxin type A1 is a first-line treatment for adult and pediatric spasticity. However, when considering the quantity of 150 kDa neurotoxin protein in relation to patient weight and the maximum recommended dose for treating adult and pediatric patients with spasticity, several concerns arise. First, the therapeutic margin (the ratio of the actual maximum quantity of toxin recommended for treating adult spasticity to its median lethal dose) appears to be relevant.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFToxins (Basel)
November 2024
Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, UMR 9197, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, Cedex, France.
Botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT/A), which blocks quantal acetylcholine (ACh) release at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), has demonstrated its efficacy in the symptomatic treatment of blepharospasm. In 3.89% of patients treated for blepharospasm at Tenon Hospital, BoNT/A was no longer effective in relieving the patient's symptoms, and a partial upper myectomy of the muscle was performed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOphthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Shiley Eye Institute, Division of Oculofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, UC San Diego.
Toxins (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Neurology, University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
There is some evidence that injections of botulinum neurotoxin effectively reduce pain in complex regional pain syndromes (CRPSs). But no or little experience appears to exist for the application of incobotulinum neurotoxin type A (incoBoNT/A) in complex pain disorders. Here, a case of CRPS type I, characterized by severe symptoms in the left forearm is presented, showed significant continuous improvement following a series of six repetitive (painful) injections into the finger, hand, and forearm muscles of incoBoNT/A every 3 months, administered at declining doses varying between 500 and 100 U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!