Investigation on the difference between biofilm morphologies of the vermifilter and conventional biofilter with the flow cytometer.

Bioresour Technol

Institute of Biofilm Technology, Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.

Published: September 2016

With the demand of new sludge reduction processes, a vermifilter (VF) was studied based on a conventional biofilter (BF). The biofilm morphology was investigated using a new technique, the flow cytometer (FCM), to find a way to optimize VF structure. VF was inoculated with Eisenia fetida, packed with ceramsites, and operated stably at the organic load of 1.2kg-VSSm(-3)d(-1) with BF as the control. Compared with BF, VF had about 13% more removal efficiency of excess sludge and 45% shorter biofilm update period. FCM profile showed the morphology of microbial cells in VF biofilms was significantly different from that in BF in upper layers, with decreases of average refractive index (about 72%) and size (about 22%), and suggested it was better to keep earthworms there to remove rod-shaped microorganisms with other filter media in lower layers to remove spherical ones combining the findings in SEM images and extracellular polymeric substances.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional biofilter
8
flow cytometer
8
investigation difference
4
difference biofilm
4
biofilm morphologies
4
morphologies vermifilter
4
vermifilter conventional
4
biofilter flow
4
cytometer demand
4
demand sludge
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!