AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights the need for evaluating virus removal efficiency in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) to manage infection risks from enteric viruses effectively.
  • The research assessed the removal efficiency of two prevalent viruses, PMMoV and JC PyV, through coagulation-sedimentation (CS) and rapid sand filtration (RSF) processes at a DWTP in Bangkok using qPCR for detection.
  • Results showed seasonal variations in virus removal, with CS and RSF showing different efficiencies depending on the virus and the wet or dry season, indicating the influence of raw water quality and virus characteristics on treatment effectiveness.

Article Abstract

In order to properly assess and manage the risk of infection by enteric viruses in tap water, virus removal efficiency should be evaluated quantitatively for individual processes in actual drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs); however, there have been only a few studies due to technical difficulties in quantifying low virus concentration in water samples. In this study, the removal efficiency of indigenous viruses was evaluated for coagulation-sedimentation (CS) and rapid sand filtration (RSF) processes in a DWTP in Bangkok, Thailand by measuring the concentration of viruses before and after treatment processes using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Water samples were collected and concentrated from raw source water, after CS, and after RSF, and inhibitory substances in water samples were reduced by use of a hydrophobic resin (DAX-8). Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and JC polyomavirus (JC PyV) were found to be highly prevalent in raw waters, with concentrations of 10(2.88 ± 0.35) and 10(3.06 ± 0.42) copies/L (geometric mean ± S.D.), respectively. Step-wise removal efficiencies were calculated for individual processes, with some variation observed between wet and dry seasons. During the wet season, PMMoV was removed less by CS and more by RSF on average (0.40 log10 vs 1.26 log10, respectively), while the reverse was true for JC PyV (1.91 log10 vs 0.49 log10, respectively). Both viruses were removed similarly during the dry season, with CS removing the most virus (PMMoV, 1.61 log10 and 0.78 log10; JC PyV, 1.70 log10, and 0.59 log10; CS and RSF, respectively). These differences between seasons were potentially due to variations in raw water quality and the characteristics of the viruses themselves. These results suggest that PMMoV and JC PyV, which are more prevalent in environmental waters than the other enteric viruses evaluated in this study, could be useful in determining viral fate for the risk management of viruses in water treatment processes in actual full-scale DWTPs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

removal efficiency
12
water treatment
12
water samples
12
water
9
virus removal
8
coagulation-sedimentation rapid
8
rapid sand
8
sand filtration
8
drinking water
8
bangkok thailand
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!