Microbial Contamination of Contact Lens Storage Cases During Daily Wear Use.

Optom Vis Sci

*PhD, BOptom †PhD ‡PhD, PGCertOcTher, FAAO §MSc, MCOptom ∥PhD, OD, FAAO **PhD, MCOptom, FAAO ††OD, PhD, MPH, FAAO Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (JD, DJM, LNS, DP, LWJ); Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Jacksonville, Florida (CL); Eurolens Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom (AM, PM); The Ocular Surface Institute, College of Optometry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas (DAB); and School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (JJN).

Published: August 2016

Purpose: To evaluate contact lens (CL) storage case contamination when used with four different CL care solutions during daily wear of three different CL materials.

Methods: A parallel, prospective, bilateral, randomized clinical trial (n = 38) was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to use one of three CL materials (etafilcon A, senofilcon A, or galyfilcon A) on a daily wear basis. Subsequently, each subject randomly used one of four different CL care solutions (Biotrue, OPTI-FREE PureMoist, RevitaLens OcuTec, and CLEAR CARE) for 2 weeks, along with their respective storage cases. After every 2-week period, their storage cases were collected and the right and left wells of each storage case were randomized for two procedures: (1) microbial enumeration by swabbing the storage case surface and (2) evaluation of biofilm formation (multipurpose solution cases only) using a crystal violet staining assay.

Results: More than 80% of storage cases were contaminated when used in conjunction with the four CL care solutions, irrespective of the CL material worn. Storage cases maintained with CLEAR CARE (mean Log colony forming units (CFU)/well ± SD, 2.0 ± 1.0) revealed significantly (p < 0.001) greater levels of contamination, compared to those maintained with Biotrue (1.3 ± 0.8) and RevitaLens OcuTec (1.2 ± 0.8). Predominantly, storage cases were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria (≥80%). There were significant differences (p = 0.013) for the levels of Gram-negative bacteria recovered from the storage cases maintained with different CL care solutions. Storage cases maintained with OPTI-FREE PureMoist (0.526 ± 0.629) showed significantly higher biofilm formation (p = 0.028) compared to those maintained with Biotrue (0.263 ± 0.197).

Conclusions: Levels of contamination ranged from 0 to 6.4 Log CFU/storage case well, which varied significantly (p < 0.001) between different CL care solutions, and storage case contamination was not modulated by CL materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000886DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

storage cases
32
care solutions
20
storage case
16
storage
12
daily wear
12
cases maintained
12
cases
9
contact lens
8
lens storage
8
case contamination
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!