AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study aimed to compare the effects of surface targeted temperature management (TTM) and endovascular TTM on cerebral diffusion-weighted MRI measurements in pigs, focusing on how these methods influence apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.
  • - Eighteen anesthetized female pigs were divided into three groups: surface cooling, endovascular cooling, and a control group, each subjected to specific temperature management before and after imaging.
  • - Results indicated that surface cooling resulted in significantly lower median ADC values compared to endovascular cooling, suggesting potential issues like cytotoxic edema, and raised questions about the reversibility of these changes upon rewarming, warranting further clinical investigation.

Article Abstract

The aim of this randomized porcine study was to compare surface targeted temperature management (TTM) to endovascular TTM evaluated by cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and by intracerebral/intramuscular microdialysis. It is well known that alteration in the temperature affects ADC, but the relationship between cerebral ADC values and the cooling method per se has not been established. Eighteen anesthetized 60-kg female swine were hemodynamically and intracerebrally monitored and subsequently subjected to a baseline MRI. The animals were then randomized into three groups: (1) surface cooling (n = 6) at 33.5°C using EMCOOLSpad, (2) endovascular cooling (n = 6) at 33.5°C using an Icy cooling catheter with the CoolGard 3000, or (3) control (n = 6) at 38.5°C using a Bair Hugger™. The swine were treated with TTM for 6 hours followed by a second MRI examination, including ADC. Blood and microdialysate were sampled regularly throughout the experiment, and glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glycerol, and the lactate/pyruvate ratio did not differ among groups, neither intracerebrally nor intramuscularly. Surface cooling yielded a significantly lower median ADC than endovascular cooling: 714 (634; 804) × 10 mm/s versus 866 (828; 927) × 10 mm/s, (p < 0.05). The surface cooling ADC was lowered to a range usually attributed to cytotoxic edema and these low values could not be explained solely by the temperature effect per se. To what extent the ADC is fully reversible at rewarming is unknown and the clinical implications should be further investigated in clinical studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ther.2016.0012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

targeted temperature
8
temperature management
8
diffusion-weighted magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
surface cooling
8
cooling n = 6
8
n = 6 335°c
8
endovascular cooling
8
cooling
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!