Objective: To compare lung ultrasonography (LUS), chest xray (CXR) and physical examination (Ex) for the detection of pathological abnormalities in the lungs of critically ill patients.

Design, Setting And Participants: A prospective cohort study of 145 patients in the intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital who were undergoing echocardiography for a clinical indication.

Main Outcome Measures: Each patient was independently assessed by Ex, CXR and LUS on the same day. Examiners were asked to comment on the presence or absence and severity of pleural effusion, lung consolidation and alveolar interstitial syndrome (AIS). Independent expert examiners performed the LUS and an independent radiologist reported on the CXR.

Results: Ex, CXR and LUS were in fair agreement with each other in detecting a pulmonary abnormality (CXR v LUS, κ = 0.31; CXR v Ex, κ = 0.29; LUS v Ex, κ = 0.22). LUS detected more abnormalities than did CXR (16.2%; χ(2) = 64.1; P < 0.001) or Ex (23.5%; χ(2) = 121.9; P < 0.001). CXR detected more pleural effusions than LUS (9.3%; χ(2) = 7.6; κ = 0.39), but LUS detected more pleural effusions than Ex (22.8%; χ(2) = 36.4; κ = 0.18). There was no significant difference in the performance of LUS and CXR in quantifying the size of a pleural effusion (Z = -1.2; P = 0.23). Ex underestimated size compared with CXR or LUS. LUS detected more consolidation than CXR (17%; χ(2) = 115.9; P < 0.001) and Ex (16.2%; χ(2) = 90.3; P < 0.001). We saw no difference in performance between CXR and Ex in detecting lung consolidation (0.9%; χ(2) = 0.51; P < 0.48). LUS detected more cases of AIS than CXR (5.5%; χ(2) = 7.9; P = 0.005) and Ex (13%; χ(2) = 25.8; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: There was only fair-to-moderate agreement between LUS, CXR and Ex in detecting pulmonary abnormalities, including pleural effusion, lung consolidation and AIS. The higher rate of detection from LUS, combined with its ease of use and increasing accessibility, makes for a powerful diagnostic tool in the ICU.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cxr lus
16
lus detected
16
lus
15
cxr
13
pleural effusion
12
lung consolidation
12
χ2
9
physical examination
8
critically ill
8
effusion lung
8

Similar Publications

Background: Traditionally, pediatric pneumonia is diagnosed through clinical examination and chest radiography (CXR), with computed tomography (CT) reserved for complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has gained popularity due to its portability and absence of ionizing radiation. This study evaluates LUS's accuracy compared to CXR in diagnosing pneumonia in children.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in newborns, particularly in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Until recently, its diagnosis had been based on clinical signs, arterial blood gas analysis, and chest X-ray (CXR). However, the frequent use of CXR exposes newborns to ionizing radiation, which can have long-term negative effects, including an increased risk of cancer, especially among premature infants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Lung ultrasound score to predict development of acute chest syndrome in children with sickle cell disease.

Hematol Transfus Cell Ther

November 2024

Escola Paulista de Medicina da Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates lung ultrasound (LUS) findings in children with sickle cell disease and acute chest syndrome (ACS), comparing them to chest radiography (CXR) results and developing a predictive score.
  • Out of 78 evaluated children, 61 exhibited ACS, with a scoring system based on LUS showing high sensitivity and predictive accuracy for determining ACS risk at both admission and follow-up.
  • The research concludes that LUS is a reliable method for assessing the likelihood of ACS in children with sickle cell disease, outperforming CXR in detecting changes associated with this condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: to measure the clinical impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of -community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), compared to clinical, radiological and ultrasound diagnosis.

Methods: 84 patients (47/37 males/females, mean age:78,57±11,7 Y) with clinical suspicion of pneumonia and with ultrasound findings of peripheral lung lesions, were investigated with CEUS for a better characterization. Final diagnosis of 65 cap was obtained with complete disappearance of symptoms and pulmonary nodule(s); 19 neoplasms: 16 patients performed histologically with bronchoscopy; 3 refused (non-invasive diagnosis with basal CT-scan and positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Traumatic pneumothorax is a serious condition that needs quick diagnosis and treatment, and lung ultrasound (LUS) is a promising method for early detection by novice physicians.
  • The study involved 96 patients with chest injuries, comparing LUS accuracy against standard diagnostic methods like chest X-rays and CT scans, showing LUS had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97.75%.
  • The findings suggest that LUS is a practical and effective diagnostic tool for traumatic pneumothorax, making it important for physicians in various healthcare settings to be trained in its use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!