Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the isolated effects of bonded and conventional spurs on the craniofacial and dentoalveolar complexes of patients in the mixed dentition with anterior open bite.

Methods: The sample included 68 subjects with anterior open bite and Class I malocclusion. Group 1 comprised 20 patients treated with bonded lingual spurs with a mean initial age of 9.31 years (SD, 1.17). Group 2 consisted of 21 patients treated with conventional lingual spurs with a mean initial age of 9.22 years (SD, 1.62). The control group (group 3) consisted of 27 untreated subjects. One-way analysis of variance tests followed by Tukey tests were used for intergroup cephalometric comparisons. After 1 month of treatment, patient acceptance of the spurs was evaluated with a questionnaire.

Results: There were significantly greater overbite increases in the experimental groups than in the control group. The group with bonded lingual spurs showed significantly better acceptance than did the group with conventional lingual spurs during chewing and eating.

Conclusions: The 2 appliances resulted in similar overbite increases during early open-bite treatment. After a week or less of treatment, 92.5% of the children had adjusted to the spurs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.11.026DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lingual spurs
20
conventional lingual
12
open-bite treatment
8
bonded conventional
8
spurs
8
anterior open
8
patients treated
8
bonded lingual
8
spurs initial
8
initial age
8

Similar Publications

The tongue-thrusting habit significantly contributes to the development of the anterior open bite (AOB), particularly when an infantile swallowing pattern persists into the later stages of childhood and adolescence. This habit results in the protrusion of the anterior teeth. Treatment typically involves addressing the underlying causes, incorporating retraining exercises, and utilizing mechanical appliances to control tongue positioning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The trial compared two treatments for anterior open bite (AOB) in children: one used both lingual spurs and build-ups (SBU), while the other used only spurs (S).
  • It involved 49 children with OHRQOL assessed at 1 and 12 months after treatment using the Child Perception Questionnaire, with a focus on functional adaptation and discomfort levels.
  • Results showed a significant 31% overall reduction in OHRQOL scores after 12 months, improvements in functional limitations for the S group, and a notable decrease in tongue-related discomfort over time for both treatment groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate the post-treatment stability of anterior open bite (AOB) cases treated with upper and lower extrusion arches in adults.

Materials And Methods: 23 patients with AOB were treated with extrusion arches and evaluated for dentoskeletal changes using lateral cephalometric radiographs before treatment (T0), after treatment (T1), and 12 months post-treatment (T2). Patients received bondable tongue spurs and vacuum-formed retainers as post-treatment retention/stability measures for 12 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Lingual spurs are highlighted as a stable treatment option for anterior open bite, but data on their tolerability in kids with mixed and permanent dentition is limited.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the effect of lingual spurs on oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents during their treatment.
  • The findings suggest that while there is an initial negative impact on quality of life from using lingual spurs, this effect is temporary, indicating a need for more robust research to confirm these results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tongue spurs have been successfully used for the early treatment of anterior open bite (AOB). However, according to our knowledge, their effectiveness in the treatment of adults has not been evaluated.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess the dentoalveolar changes observed after the use of customized bonded shark-tooth-like spurs (JAWs) in adults with AOB.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!