Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Intestinal malrotation is a known association of anorectal malformations (ARM). Exact incidence, prognosis and surgical implications related to ARM are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify relevant associations between ARM and the presence of malrotation.
Methods: Records of patients from two referral centers were retrospectively analyzed looking for malrotation associated to ARM and its management, as well as factors for functional prognosis.
Results: 40 patients out of 2572 with ARM (1.6%) were found to have malrotation. Females were more commonly affected, and severe malformations were more frequent (cloaca, covered cloacal exstrophy in females and rectoprostatic and rectobladder neck fistula in males). Factors significantly associated with malrotation included Müllerian or Wolffian duct anomalies (P<0.05), while fecal continence status, presence of constipation, and use of laxatives or enemas were not. Detecting and correcting malrotation early on or at the time of colostomy creation represented a protective factor against additional surgeries for bowel obstruction and volvulus (P<0.001). Removal of the appendix during malrotation treatment required constructing a neoappendicostomy using a cecal flap in 9 out of 14 patients needing antegrade enema administration.
Conclusions: Malrotation presence in patients with ARM has the same frequency as in the general population, but it is more common in severe malformations. Surgeons treating these patients should address the malrotation at the time of colostomy opening if detected. The appendix should be preserved for potential future use as an appendicostomy for antegrade administration of enemas.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.008 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!