Evaluation of a New Sonoclot Device for Heparin Management in Cardiac Surgery.

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost

Institute of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Triemli City Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Published: January 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Sonoclot device measures activated clotting time and coagulation status, with a new version (S2) released to replace the previous one (S1).
  • A study involving 30 elective cardiac surgery patients compared the performance of S1 and S2 through various blood sampling points, using Bland-Altman analysis for accuracy.
  • Results indicated that the S2 device reported faster clotting times, with significant percentage differences in results, which may require adjustments in heparin management practices to avoid incorrect dosing.

Article Abstract

Background: Sonoclot is used to measure kaolin-based activated clotting time (kACT) for heparin management. Apart from measuring kACT, the device assesses the patient's coagulation status by glass bead-activated tests (gbACTs; measuring also clot rate [CR] and platelet function [PF]). Recently, a new version of the Sonoclot has been released, and the redesign may result in performance changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of the new (S2) and the previous (S1) Sonoclot.

Methods: The S1 was used in the routine management of 30 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Blood samples were taken at baseline (T1), after heparin administration (200 U/kg, 100 U/kg; T2 and T3), during cardiopulmonary bypass (T4), after protamine infusion (T5), and before intensive care unit transfer (T6). Kaolin-based activated clotting time and gbACTs were measured in duplicate by both the old and the new device and performance compared by Bland-Altman analysis and percentage error calculation.

Results: A total of 300 kACT and 180 gbACTs were available. Bland-Altman analysis for kACT revealed that S2 consistently reported results in shorter time compared to S1 (overall = -14.7%). Comparing S2 and S1, the glass bead-activated tests showed mean percentage differences of -18.9% (gbACTs), +37.4% (CR), and -3.7% (PF).

Conclusion: Since clotting is faster in the new S2 compared to S1, shorter clotting times have to be considered in clinical practice. The use of S2 kACT in heparin management will result in higher heparin and protamine dosing unless heparin kACT target values are adjusted to correct for the differences in results between S1 and S2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029616651148DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

heparin management
12
cardiac surgery
8
kaolin-based activated
8
activated clotting
8
clotting time
8
kact heparin
8
glass bead-activated
8
bead-activated tests
8
bland-altman analysis
8
heparin
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!