Benchmarking the performance of fixed-image receptor digital radiography systems. Part 2: system performance metric.

Australas Phys Eng Sci Med

Biomedical Technology Services, Gold Coast University Hospital, Health Support Queensland, Southport, Australia.

Published: June 2016

This is part two of a two-part study in benchmarking system performance of fixed digital radiographic systems. The study compares the system performance of seven fixed digital radiography systems based on quantitative metrics like modulation transfer function (sMTF), normalised noise power spectrum (sNNPS), detective quantum efficiency (sDQE) and entrance surface air kerma (ESAK). It was found that the most efficient image receptors (greatest sDQE) were not necessarily operating at the lowest ESAK. In part one of this study, sMTF is shown to depend on system configuration while sNNPS is shown to be relatively consistent across systems. Systems are ranked on their signal-to-noise ratio efficiency (sDQE) and their ESAK. Systems using the same equipment configuration do not necessarily have the same system performance. This implies radiographic practice at the site will have an impact on the overall system performance. In general, systems are more dose efficient at low dose settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0439-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

system performance
20
digital radiography
8
radiography systems
8
performance fixed
8
fixed digital
8
efficiency sdqe
8
systems
7
system
6
performance
5
benchmarking performance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!