Rationale And Objectives: We aimed to investigate a multiparametric approach using single-source dual-energy computed tomography (ssDECT) for the characterization of renal stones.

Materials And Methods: ssDECT scans were performed at 80 and 140 kVp on 32 ex vivo kidney stones of 3-10 mm in a phantom. True composition was determined by infrared spectroscopy to be uric acid (UA; n = 14), struvite (n = 7), cystine (n = 7), or calcium oxalate monohydrate (n = 4). Measurements were obtained for up to 52 variables, including mean density at 11 monochromatic keV levels, effective Z, and multiple material basis pairs. The data were analyzed with five multiparametric algorithms. After omitting 8 stones smaller than 5 mm, the remaining 24-stone dataset was similarly analyzed. Both stone datasets were also analyzed with a subset of 14 commonly used variables in the same fashion.

Results: For the 32-stone dataset, the best method for distinguishing UA from non-UA stones was 97% accurate, and for distinguishing the non-UA subtypes was 72% accurate. For the 24-stone dataset, the best method for distinguishing UA from non-UA stones was 100% accurate, and for distinguishing the non-UA subtypes was 75% accurate.

Conclusion: Multiparametric ssDECT methods can distinguish UA from non-UA stones of 5 mm or larger with 100% accuracy. The best model to distinguish the non-UA renal stone subtypes was 75% accurate. Further refinement of this multiparametric approach may increase the diagnostic accuracy of separating non-UA subtypes and assist in the development of a clinical paradigm for in vivo use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.03.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

distinguishing non-ua
16
multiparametric approach
12
non-ua stones
12
non-ua subtypes
12
renal stone
8
single-source dual-energy
8
dual-energy computed
8
computed tomography
8
24-stone dataset
8
dataset best
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • This study focuses on developing a method to differentiate between pure uric acid stones and other types of urinary stones using computed tomography (CT) imaging.
  • Researchers analyzed clinical data and CT images from patients at a urology department to create a deep learning model that evaluates the chemical composition of stones.
  • The model achieved high accuracy (97.01%) in predicting stone types, demonstrating its potential as a quick and effective diagnostic tool for urinary stone disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The correct diagnosis of uric acid (UA) stones has important clinical implications since patients with a high risk of perioperative morbidity may be spared surgical intervention and be offered alkalization therapy. We developed and validated a machine learning (ML)-based model to identify stones on computed tomography (CT) images and simultaneously classify UA stones from non-UA stones. An international, multicenter study was performed on 202 patients who received percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones with HU < 800.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess a novel low-dose CT-protocol, combining a 150 kV spectral filtration unenhanced protocol (Sn150 kVp) and a stone-targeted dual-energy CT (DECT) in patients with urolithiasis.

Methods: 232 (151 male, 49 ± 16.4 years) patients with urolithiasis received a low-dose non-contrast enhanced CT (NCCT) for suspected urinary stones either on a third-generation dual-source CT system (DSCT) using Sn150 kVp (n = 116, group 1), or on a second-generation DSCT (n = 116 group 2) using single energy (SE) 120 kVp.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Scientists wanted to find a better way to identify types of kidney stones without surgery, using a special type of imaging called DECT.
  • In a study with 84 patients, DECT correctly identified uric acid stones 100% of the time, which is great news for patients.
  • Measuring the pH of urine helped improve DECT's accuracy, and this newer DECT version uses less radiation than older models, making it safer for patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Size matters: observations regarding the sonographic double contour sign in different joint sizes in acute gouty arthritis.

Z Rheumatol

November 2018

Department of Oncology, Rheumatology, Nephrology, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Objective: In distinguishing urate arthritis (UA) from non-crystal-related arthritides, joint sonography including the detection of the double contour sign (DCS) and hypervascularization using power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) is an important step in the diagnostic process. But are these sonographic features equally reliable in every accessible joint under real-life conditions?

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 362 patients with acute arthritis and evaluated the DCS and the degree of PDUS hypervascularization in patients with gout and in those with arthritis other than urate arthritis (non-UA). We classified all joints into the groups small, medium, and large.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!