6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Long Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv

Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea; Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address:

Published: July 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) versus 12-month DAPT in patients who received everolimus-eluting stents.
  • A total of 1,400 patients were randomly assigned to either treatment duration, and the primary outcome was measured at one year after stent implantation, focusing on serious cardiovascular events.
  • Results showed no significant differences in primary outcomes or stent thrombosis rates between the two groups, suggesting that a shorter DAPT duration may be just as safe as a longer one.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration was comparable with a 12-month duration in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation.

Background: Well-designed studies that determine optimal DAPT strategies after everolimus-eluting stent implantation are limited.

Methods: A total of 1,400 patients (implanted mean total stent length >45 mm) were randomly assigned to receive 6-month (n = 699) or 12-month (n = 701) DAPT between October 2010 and July 2014 at 20 centers in Korea. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding at 1 year, analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results: The primary endpoint occurred in 15 patients (2.2%) in the 6-month DAPT group and 14 patients (2.1%) in the 12-month DAPT group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.07; p = 0.854). Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (0.3%) in the 6-month DAPT group and in 2 patients (0.3%) in the 12-month DAPT group (HR: 1.00; p = 0.999). There were no significant between-group differences in the primary endpoint in 686 patients with acute coronary syndrome (2.4% in both groups; HR: 1.00; p = 0.994) and in 506 patients with diabetes mellitus (2.2% [6-month] vs. 3.3% [12-month]; HR: 0.64; p = 0.428).

Conclusions: Compared with 12-month DAPT, 6-month DAPT did not increase the composite events of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or TIMI major bleeding at 1 year in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent implantation. (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on Outcomes of XIENCE PRIME Stents in Long Lesions [IVUS-XPL Study]; NCT01308281).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dapt group
16
everolimus-eluting stent
12
primary endpoint
12
myocardial infarction
12
6-month dapt
12
12-month dapt
12
dapt
9
patients
9
dual-antiplatelet therapy
8
patients underwent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!