Neurolinguistic accounts of sentence comprehension identify a network of relevant brain regions, but do not detail the information flowing through them. We investigate syntactic information. Does brain activity implicate a computation over hierarchical grammars or does it simply reflect linear order, as in a Markov chain? To address this question, we quantify the cognitive states implied by alternative parsing models. We compare processing-complexity predictions from these states against fMRI timecourses from regions that have been implicated in sentence comprehension. We find that hierarchical grammars independently predict timecourses from left anterior and posterior temporal lobe. Markov models are predictive in these regions and across a broader network that includes the inferior frontal gyrus. These results suggest that while linear effects are wide-spread across the language network, certain areas in the left temporal lobe deal with abstract, hierarchical syntactic representations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4893969 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.008 | DOI Listing |
JB JS Open Access
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, California.
Background: This study assesses the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in simplifying complex language within orthopaedic patient education materials (PEMs) and identifies predictive factors for successful text transformation.
Methods: We transformed 48 orthopaedic PEMs using GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Claude 2, and Llama 2.
Front Psychol
December 2024
Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
This study investigates the acquisition of sentence focus in Russian by adult English-Russian bilinguals, while paying special attention to the relative contribution of constituent order and prosodic expression. It aims to understand how these factors influence perceived word-level prominence and focus assignment during listening. We present results of two listening tasks designed to examine the influence of pitch cues and constituent order on perceived word prominence (Experiment 1) and focus assignment (Experiment 2) during the auditory comprehension of SV[O] and OV[S] sentences in Russian.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBehav Sci (Basel)
December 2024
College of Chinese Language and Literature, Qufu Normal University, No. 57, Jingxuan Road, Qufu 273165, China.
Two experiments were conducted to examine native and non-native speakers' recognition of Chinese two-character words (2C-words) in the context of audio sentence comprehension. The recording was played of a sentence, in which a collocation composed of a number word, a sortal classifier, and a noun (NCN) was embedded. When the participants were about to hear the noun of the NCN (Noun), the playing stopped, and a target was visually presented, which was the Noun, the character-transposed word of the Noun (NounT), or a control word (NounC), or was a homophone nonword for Noun, NounT, or NounC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
November 2024
School of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Lushannan Road No. 2, Yuelu District, Changsha 410082, China.
Background/objectives: Normative perceptual segmentation facilitates event perception, comprehension, and memory. Given that native English listeners' normative perceptual segmentation of English speech streams coexists with a highly selective attention pattern at segmentation boundaries, it is significant to test whether Chinese learners of English have a different attention pattern at boundaries, thereby checking whether they perform a normative segmentation.
Methods: Thirty Chinese learners of English with relatively higher language proficiency (CLH) and 26 with relatively lower language proficiency (CLL) listened to a series of English audio sentences.
Brain Sci
November 2024
ISJPS UMR 8103 CNRS, Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, 75005 Paris, France.
Background: The aim of this study is to use an eye tracker to compare the understanding of three forms of implicitness (i.e., presupposition, conversational implicatures, and irony) in 139 pupils from the first to the fifth year of elementary school.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!