Out-of-pocket expenditure on prenatal and natal care post Janani Suraksha Yojana: a case from Rajasthan, India.

J Health Popul Nutr

Department of Fertility Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Govandi Station Road, Deonar, Mumbai, 400088, Maharashtra, India.

Published: May 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) has improved access to maternal care services, but there's limited understanding of out-of-pocket costs for these services after its implementation.
  • A study in Rajasthan found that expenses for antenatal care and deliveries varied greatly depending on the type of service, with the JSY covering only a portion of costs, especially for complicated cases.
  • Economic status, education, and pregnancy complications significantly influence these costs, indicating a need for better public health resources for complicated deliveries.

Article Abstract

Background: Though Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) under National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) is successful in increasing antenatal and natal care services, little is known on the cost coverage of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on maternal care services post-NRHM period.

Methods: Using data from a community-based study of 424 recently delivered women in Rajasthan, this paper examined the variation in OOPE in accessing maternal health services and the extent to which JSY incentives covered the burden of cost incurred. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses are used to understand the differential and determinants of OOPE.

Results: The mean OOPE for antenatal care was US$26 at public health centres and US$64 at private health centres. The OOPE (antenatal and natal) per delivery was US$32 if delivery was conducted at home, US$78 at public facility and US$154 at private facility. The OOPE varied by the type of delivery, delivery with complications and place of ANC. The OOPE in public health centre was US$44 and US$145 for normal and complicated delivery, respectively. The share of JSY was 44 % of the total cost per delivery, 77 % in case of normal delivery and 23 % for complicated delivery. Results from the log linear model suggest that economic status, educational level and pregnancy complications are significant predictors of OOPE.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that JSY has increased the coverage of institutional delivery and reduced financial stress to household and families but not sufficient for complicated delivery. Provisioning of providing sonography/other test and treating complicated cases in public health centres need to be strengthened.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5025966PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41043-016-0051-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public health
12
health centres
12
complicated delivery
12
delivery
10
out-of-pocket expenditure
8
natal care
8
janani suraksha
8
suraksha yojana
8
antenatal natal
8
care services
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!