AI Article Synopsis

  • Self-control is crucial in many areas of life but can diminish over time, with reasons for this decline being unclear.
  • Recent interest has emerged in using the central governor model from exercise physiology to explain why mental performance deteriorates over time, suggesting a central nervous system mechanism regulates exertion to prevent energy depletion.
  • However, this model is controversial, with concerns about its applicability to psychology due to issues like the influence of minor incentives on fatigue, lack of evidence linking mental effort to significant energy consumption, and the model's tendency to become unfalsifiable, limiting its usefulness in understanding disengagement from challenging tasks.

Article Abstract

Self-control is considered broadly important for many domains of life. One of its unfortunate features, however, is that it tends to wane over time, with little agreement about why this is the case. Recently, there has been a push to address this problem by looking to the literature in exercise physiology, specifically the work on the central governor model of physical fatigue. Trying to explain how and why mental performance wanes over time, the central governor model suggests that exertion is throttled by some central nervous system mechanism that receives information about energetic bodily needs and motivational drives to regulate exertion and, ultimately, to prevent homeostatic breakdown, chiefly energy depletion. While we admire the spirit of integration and the attempt to shed light on an important topic in psychology, our concern is that the central governor model is very controversial in exercise physiology, with increasing calls to abandon it altogether, making it a poor fit for psychology. Our concerns are threefold. First, while we agree that preservation of bodily homeostasis makes for an elegant ultimate account, the fact that such important homeostatic concerns can be regularly overturned with even slight incentives (e.g., a smile) renders the ultimate account impotent and points to other ultimate functions for fatigue. Second, despite the central governor being thought to take as input information about the metabolic needs of the body, there is no credible evidence that mental effort actually consumes inordinate amounts of energy that are not already circulating in the brain. Third, recent modifications of the model make the central governor appear like an all-knowing homunculus and unfalsifiable in principle, thus contributing very little to our understanding of why people tend to disengage from effortful tasks over time. We note that the latest models in exercise physiology have actually borrowed concepts and models from psychology to understand physical performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4854881PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00656DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

central governor
24
governor model
16
exercise physiology
12
ultimate account
8
central
7
model
5
governor
5
exercise
4
model exercise
4
exercise regulation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!