Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the factors that influence decision-making to forgo transplantation in favour of remaining on nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD).

Design: A grounded theory approach using in-depth telephone interviewing was used.

Setting: Participants were identified from 2 tertiary care renal programmes in Canada.

Participants: The study participants were otherwise eligible patients with end-stage renal disease who have opted to remain off of the transplant list. A total of 7 eligible participants were interviewed. 5 were male. The mean age was 46 years.

Analysis: A constant comparative method of analysis was used to identify a core category and factors influencing the decision-making process.

Results: In this grounded theory study of people receiving NHD who refused kidney transplantation, the core category of 'why take a chance when things are going well?' was identified, along with 4 factors that influenced the decision including 'negative past experience', 'feeling well on NHD', 'gaining autonomy' and 'responsibility'.

Conclusions: This study provides insight into patients' thought processes surrounding an important treatment decision. Such insights might help the renal team to better understand, and thereby respect, patient choice in a patient-centred care paradigm. Findings may also be useful in the development of education programmes addressing the specific concerns of this population of patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874163PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011951DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

grounded theory
12
theory study
8
nocturnal haemodialysis
8
kidney transplantation
8
core category
8
study
5
chance? qualitative
4
qualitative grounded
4
study nocturnal
4
haemodialysis recipients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!