Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Stickler syndrome is a connective tissue disorder characterized by orofacial, ocular, skeletal and auditory symptoms. The orofacial phenotype mainly consists of midfacial hypoplasia, micrognathia and cleft palate. Large phenotypic variability is evident though. Few studies have tried to substantiate the typical facial appearance in Stickler syndrome patients.
Methods: Molecularly confirmed Stickler patients were invited to undergo cephalometric analysis based on a lateral radiograph in standardized conditions. Angular and linear measurements were performed according to Steiner's and Sassouni's analysis and compared with age- and gender-matched reference values.
Results: Thirteen patients aged 10-62y were included, twelve of whom had type 1 Stickler syndrome (COL2A1 mutation) and one type 2 Stickler syndrome (COL11A1 mutation). The position of maxilla and mandible relative to the cranial base was not significantly different from the reference population (S-N-A: p = 0.73, S-N-B: p = 0.43). The mandibular plane and y-axis showed an elevated angle with the cranial base in most patients, although not significant for the total group (S-N to Go-Me: p = 0.20, S-N to S-Gn: p = 0.18). Dental analysis was normal, except for a higher overjet value (p = 0.006) and a higher angle between occlusal plane and Frankfort plane (p = 0.022).
Conclusion: Cephalometric analysis was not able to thoroughly prove the abnormal facial appearance in Stickler syndrome. The majority of patients had normal dentofacial proportions. The most frequently observed anomaly in our series is a rather short and posteriorly rotated mandible, but clinical variability is high.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.04.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!