AI Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how people perceive the beauty of random density texture patterns in two experiments involving different grid sizes and fill levels.
- In the first experiment with a 10×10 grid, participants rated patterns from 10% to 100% fill, revealing an inverted U-shaped preference that favored mid-range density levels.
- The second experiment, using a 15×15 grid, confirmed the preference for density over fixed element count, indicating that more complex patterns were seen as more aesthetically pleasing by the observers.
Article Abstract
We report two experiments on the perceived aesthetic quality of random density texture patterns. In each experiment a square grid was filled with a progressively larger number of elements. Grid size in Experiment 1 was 10×10 with elements added to create a variety of textures ranging from 10%-100% fill levels. Participants rated the beauty of the patterns. Average judgments across all observers showed an inverted U-shaped function that peaked near middle densities. In Experiment 2 grid size was increased to 15×15 to see if observers preferred patterns with a fixed density or a fixed number of elements. The results of the second experiment were nearly identical to that of the first showing a preference for density over fixed element number. Ratings in both studies correlated positively with a GIF compression metric of complexity and with edge length. Within the range of stimuli used, observers judge more complex patterns to be more beautiful.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.04.007 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!