Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed (AVA, BioThrax) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of anthrax in adults. The PEP schedule is 3 subcutaneous (SC) doses (0, 14 and 28 days), in conjunction with a 60 day course of antimicrobials. The objectives of this study were to understand the onset of protection from AVA PEP vaccination and to assess the potential for shortening the duration of antimicrobial treatment (http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/mcm/phemce/Documents/2014-phemce-sip.pdf). We determined the efficacy against inhalation anthrax in nonhuman primates (NHP) of the first two doses of the PEP schedule by infectious challenge at the time scheduled for receipt of the third PEP dose (Day 28). Forty-eight cynomolgus macaques were randomized to five groups and vaccinated with serial dilutions of AVA on Days 0 and 14. NHP were exposed to Bacillus anthracis Ames spores on Day 28 (target dose 200 LD equivalents). Anti-protective antigen (PA) IgG and toxin neutralizing antibody (TNA) responses to vaccination and in post-challenge survivors were determined. Post-challenge blood and selected tissue samples were assessed for B. anthracis at necropsy or end of study (Day 56). Pre-challenge humoral immune responses correlated with survival, which ranged from 24 to 100% survival depending on vaccination group. Surviving, vaccinated animals had elevated anti-PA IgG and TNA levels for the duration of the study, were abacteremic, exhibited no apparent signs of infection, and had no gross or microscopic lesions. However, survivors had residual spores in lung tissues. We conclude that the first two doses of the PEP schedule provide high levels of protection by the scheduled timing of the third dose. These data may also support consideration of a shorter duration PEP antimicrobial regimen.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5097032 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.048 | DOI Listing |
Vaccine
January 2025
Jenner Institute, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK.
Background: Pre-exposure prophylactic rabies vaccination (PrEP) is advised for travellers to countries with high rabies incidence, but rarely available for local residents. Some studies suggest poor cost-effectiveness of PrEP in such settings, but have generally focused upon post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) cost savings as the main benefit of PrEP, without considering lives saved by PrEP efficacy.
Methods: We compared incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of use of rabies PrEP, against an alternative of using only PEP, by adapting a decision-tree model previously used to inform Gavi's investment in rabies PEP.
Front Psychiatry
November 2024
Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Messina, Italy.
Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a range of intellectual and language abilities. Its heterogeneity is acknowledged in modern diagnostics, complicating research and necessitating precision medicine and a multidimensional approach for individualized treatment and accurate assessment. Intellectual and language functioning influence adaptive skills and symptomatology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Oncol
October 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
The Prostate Cancer Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) is a 6-month, home-based intervention aimed at enhancing mental health in men undergoing curative prostate cancer treatment. This exploratory secondary analysis evaluates PC-PEP's impact on relationship satisfaction, quality of life, and support group attendance among partnered participants. In a crossover randomized clinical trial ClinicalTrials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
September 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College), Nanchang, P.R. China.
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofol, propofol, propofol and etomidate mixture or ciprofol and etomidate mixture in patients undergoing painless gastroscopic anesthesia, and to explore the optimal plan to relieve the patient's discomfort.
Methods: A total of 120 patients scheduled for painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to 4 groups: propofol (Group P), ciprofol (Group C), propofol-etomidate mixture (Group P-E), and ciprofol-etomidate mixture (Group C-E). The success rate of gastroscopy examination, patient satisfaction, incidence of injection pain, hemodynamic parameters, induction time, procedure time, the consumption of drugs, awakening time, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated.
N Engl J Med
December 2024
From Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London (David J. Jackson), Barts Health NHS Trust (P.E.P.), and GSK (L.J., N.B., S.S., P.H.), London, and the Oxford Respiratory NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford (I.D.P.) - all in the United Kingdom; National Jewish Health, Denver (M.E.W.); the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison (Daniel J. Jackson); the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Bernstein Clinical Research Center, Cincinnati (D.B.); Clinical Research Center, Respiratory Medicine, IKF Pneumologie Mainz, Mainz, and Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg - both in Germany (S.K.); State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Joint International Research Laboratory of Respiratory Health, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China (R.C.); Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan (J.S.); Hospital Vithas Xanit Internacional, Málaga, Spain (G.L.M.); Centrum Medyczne Lucyna Andrzej Dymek, Strzelce Opolskie, Poland (L.D.); and GSK, Collegeville, PA (D.S.).
Background: Depemokimab is an ultra-long-acting biologic therapy with enhanced binding affinity for interleukin-5 that may enable effective 6-month dosing intervals.
Methods: In these phase 3A, randomized, placebo-controlled replicate trials, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of depemokimab in patients with severe asthma and an eosinophilic phenotype characterized by a high eosinophil count (≥300 cells per microliter in the previous 12 months or ≥150 cells per microliter at screening) and a history of exacerbations despite the receipt of medium- or high-dose inhaled glucocorticoids. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either depemokimab (at a dose of 100 mg subcutaneously) or placebo at weeks 0 and 26, plus standard care.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!