Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Fat grafting in breast augmentation surgery is becoming increasingly popular and is allowing surgeons to fill the gaps that implant augmentation alone cannot. However, one current issue surrounding fat grafting is resorption.
Objectives: In this prospective study, the authors present their experience of fat grafting and resorption in 26 patients who had fat transfer to correct deformities or asymmetries following primary breast enlargement surgery.
Methods: The fat utilized was harvested and processed using the Puregraft system. Fat grafting was performed until the problem was visually corrected, followed by an additional 30% overcorrection. Photographs were taken preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, and analyzed utilizing cloud-based 3-dimensional imaging software to measure the breast volumes and calculate 1-year resorption rates. Both patients and physicians were asked to rate their satisfaction.
Results: The total volume of fat transferred ranged from 160 cc to 360 cc, with an average of 280 cc per procedure. The absolute volume of tissue resorption showed considerable variation (median, 42.6 mL; range, 5.5-62 mL). However, there was a very close correlation between the volume resorbed and the volume implanted: the more volume injected, the more volume absorbed. When expressed as a percentage of implanted tissue, the resorption rate was 27.5 ± 0.8% (mean ± standard deviation) with a very narrow range (25.7%-28.9%). Patients and physicians reported a satisfaction rate of "excellent" in 83.3% and 75% of cases, respectively.
Conclusions: At 1 year, 25.7% to 28.9% of the injected fat had been resorbed in a predictable, reproducible, and effective manner.
Level Of Evidence: 4 Therapeutic.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw060 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!