Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Discriminate analysis was used to evaluate the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of anti-Treponema hyodysenteriae antibodies in experimentally and naturally infected swine. In trial 1, 26 pigs were randomly divided into three groups (naturally infected, n = 8; experimentally infected, n = 11; and noninfected, n = 7), and samples were collected for 10 weeks. For trial 2, 31 pigs were randomly divided into two groups (naturally infected, n = 22; and noninfected, n = 7), and samples were collected for 20 weeks. Rectal swabs for T. hyodysenteriae isolation were collected daily, and fecal samples for isolation of Salmonella spp. were collected weekly. Serum samples for ELISA evaluation were collected biweekly (trial 1) or weekly (trial 2). Results of discriminate analysis indicated that the ELISA correctly identified 90% or more of the individually infected pigs at prior probabilities of infection ranging from 60 to 90%. The test correctly identified noninfected pigs at a lower rate (61 to 92% range). The mean ELISA titers of naturally infected pigs without clinical signs were not significantly different (P less than 0.05) from the titers of both groups of experimentally infected pigs. Mean ELISA titers of naturally infected pigs without clinical signs were significantly greater than the mean titers of naturally infected pigs with clinical signs. Naturally infected pigs with clinical signs had a mean ELISA titer that was significantly greater than that of noninfected pigs and significantly less than the mean titers of the experimentally infected pigs without clinical signs and the naturally infected pigs without clinical signs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC267331 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.3.411-416.1989 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!