Moral decision making involves affective and cognitive functions like emotional empathy, reasoning and cognitive empathy/theory of mind (ToM), which are discussed to be subject to age-related alterations. Additionally, sex differences in moral decision making have been reported. However, age-related changes in moral decision making from early to late adulthood and their relation to sex and neuropsychological functions have not been studied yet. One hundred ninety seven participants (122 female), aged 19-86 years, were tested with a moral decision making task comprising forced choice "everyday life" situations in which an altruistic option that favors a socially accepted alternative had to be considered against an egoistic option that favors personal benefit over social interests. The percentage of altruistic decisions was analyzed. A structural equation model (SEM) was calculated to test the hypothesis whether age and sex predict altruistic moral decision, and whether relevant neuropsychological domains mediate these hypothesized relationships. A significant relationship between age and moral decision making was found indicating more frequent altruistic decisions with increasing age. Furthermore, women decided more altruistically than men. The SEM showed that both age and sex are significant predictors of altruistic moral decision making, mediated by emotional empathy but not by reasoning. No cognitive empathy and ToM scores were correlated to age and moral decision making at the same time and thus were not included in the SEM. Our data suggest that increasing age and female sex have an effect on altruistic moral decisions, but that this effect is fully mediated by emotional empathy. The fact that changes of moral decision making with age are mediated by emotional empathy can be interpreted in the light of the so-called "positivity effect" and increasing avoidance of negative affect in aging. The mediated sex effect might represent both biological aspects and socialized sex roles for higher emotional empathy leading to more altruistic decisions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4828431 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00067 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Evid Based Med
December 2024
Department of Public Health, History of Science, and Gynecology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche Faculty of Medicine, Sant Joan D'Alacant, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain
Objective: The objective of this study is to analyse the perspectives of screening candidates and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making (SDM) in prostate cancer (PCa) screening using the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test.
Design: Descriptive qualitative study (May-December 2022): six face-to-face focus groups and four semistructured interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using ATLAS.ti software.
Foods
January 2025
Department of Administration, Faculty of Administration and Economics, University of Santiago of Chile (USACH), Santiago 9170020, Chile.
This study evaluated how healthy lifestyle motivators (MHLs) influence the Peruvian market's willingness to consume healthy food (WCHBF). The main objective was to analyze the relationship of variables, such as attitude (ATT), perceived behavioral control (PBC), self-identity (SI), and moral norms (MN) with the WCHBF. This study adopted a quantitative, non-experimental, and cross-sectional approach, using a self-administered questionnaire for data collection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Healthc Manag
January 2025
Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado.
Goal: To evaluate long-term outcomes of Better Together Physician Coaching, a digital life-coaching program to improve resident well-being.
Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of survey data from the pilot program implementation between January 2021 and June 2022. An intention-to-treat analysis was completed for baseline versus post-6 months and baseline versus post-12 months for all outcome measures.
Cancer Nurs
January 2025
Author Affiliations: Department Research, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; and NURECARE Research Group, Institut d'Investigació i Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Huertas-Zurriaga); Department Research, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol; Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; GRIN Group, IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research; and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Cabrera-Jaime); Tecnocampus University and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Navarri); Oncology Department, Hereditarian Cancer Program, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO (Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology), IGTP (Health Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Teruel-Garcia); and Nursing Research Group in Vulnerability and Health (GRIVIS); and Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Leyva-Moral), Badalona, Spain.
Glob Adv Integr Med Health
January 2025
Department of Hospital Medicine, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cognitive Bias and the Treatment of Complex Illnesses: A Reflection on Substance Use Disorder and Long COVID. Physicians use anchoring and confirmation bias every day to make snap decisions about patient care. However, in the case of poorly understood complex illness, cognitive bias can lead to poor outcomes for the patient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!