Stimulation of Critically Ill Patients: Relationship to Sedation.

Am J Crit Care

Mary Jo Grap is an emeritus professor and Ruth Burk is affiliate faculty, Adult Health and Nursing Systems Department, School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia. Cindy L. Munro is a professor and associate dean, Research and Innovation, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. Paul A. Wetzel is an associate professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University. Jessica M. Ketchum is lead biostatistician, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado. James S. Ketchum is a doctoral student, Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University. William L. Anderson is senior data scientist and head of predictive modeling, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina. Al M. Best is professor and director of faculty research development, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University. V. Anne Hamilton is a family nurse practitioner, Gastrointestinal Specialists, Inc, Richmond, Virginia. Nyimas Y. Arief is chair of the science department, Tawheed Preparatory School, Richmond, Virginia. Tenesha Bottoms is a registered nurse, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia. Curtis N. Sessler is a professor, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University.

Published: May 2016

Objectives: To describe the number and type of stimulation events and the relationship of stimulation to sedation level in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

Methods: A 4-hour direct observation was conducted in 103 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Stimulation events and sedation level before and after the stimulation were documented. Eight categories of stimulation events were developed in a previous pilot study of 36 patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Sedation was measured continuously by using a processed electroencephalographic score (patient state index [PSI]) and intermittently by using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale.

Results: Patients were mostly alert/mildly sedated (54.4%) at study enrollment. During the 349 hours of observation, 58.8% of the time included stimulation events. General auditory types of stimulation were most common (41.2% of observed time), followed by respiratory management and tactile family stimulation. For all events, auditory-talking, tactile-general, tactile-noxious, and tactile-highly noxious stimuli were associated with higher PSIs (all P < .001) after stimulation; other stimuli were not. Level of consciousness influenced response to stimuli, with almost all types of stimuli increasing PSI for patients more deeply sedated (PSI < 60) just before the stimuli. However, the effect of stimulation on PSI for more alert patients (PSI > 60) was small and variable.

Discussion: Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation are subjected to various forms of auditory and tactile stimulation frequently throughout the day. All types of stimuli increased arousal in patients who were more deeply sedated. The effect of stimulation in patients who were not deeply sedated was minimal and inconsistent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2016269DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stimulation events
20
patients receiving
16
receiving mechanical
16
stimulation
13
mechanical ventilation
12
patients deeply
12
deeply sedated
12
patients
10
critically ill
8
ill patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!