A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Subxiphoid vs intercostal single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomised controlled trial. | LitMetric

Introduction: The conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is performed through the intercostals incisions. In this study, we reported our current experience of thoracoscopic surgery using a subxiphoid single-incision and compared it with the intercostal uniport VATS in the operation time and postoperative pain for spontaneous pneumothorax.

Methods: From July 2014 to September 2015, 43 consecutive patients with spontaneous pneumothorax underwent the unilateral or bilateral bullectomy vie VATS. Among these, 22 patients were treated by the subxiphoid single-incision VATS, and 21 patients were treated using the conventional intercostals uniport VATS. The duration of operation, hospital stay days and inpatient pain scores were compared between each group.

Results: The postoperative pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 0, 1, 2 and 3 were significantly lower for patients who underwent the subxiphoid single-incision VATS than those who underwent the intercostal uniport VATS (p < 0.05). However, the subxiphoid single-incision VATS needed longer surgical time than the intercostal uniport VATS (p < 0.001).

Discussion: The subxiphoid uniport VATS could decrease the postoperative pain and was safe and effective for performing the unilateral or bilateral bullectomy, but, demanded longer surgical time comparing with the intercostal uniport VATS.

Conclusions: Subxiphoid single-incision VATS, as a new method for bullectomy, could provide a good choice of the incision position for these young patients with spontaneous pneumothorax.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.035DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thoracoscopic surgery
12
subxiphoid single-incision
12
uniport vats
12
video-assisted thoracoscopic
8
spontaneous pneumothorax
8
intercostal uniport
8
postoperative pain
8
vats patients
8
patients treated
8
single-incision vats
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!